نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث دانشگاه خوارزمی

2 دانش پژوه سطح چهار حوزه علمیه رفیعه المصطفی

چکیده

محمد آرکون، دانشمند معاصر الجزایری، دیدگاه‌های خاصی پیرامون قرآن کریم دارد. بسیاری از قرآن‌پژوهان، متفکران اسلام و عرب، اندیشه‌ها و آثار او را موردبررسی قرار داده‌اند. یکی از موضوعاتی که وی مفصل به آن پرداخته، مباحث مربوط به زبان قرآن است. آرکون در مباحث زبانی قرآن، بر اسطوره‌ای بودن آن تأکید دارد. وی اسطوره را تعبیری مجازی و نمادین می‌داند که پذیرای اطلاق و تکثر معناست. او متن دینی را با اندیشه نواعتزالی و نقدگرایانه تحلیل کرده است. آرکون متن قرآنی را نخست به‌مثابۀ متن زبانی، تابع روش زبان‌شناسی قرار داده و پس از آن با توجه به جنبه‌های تاریخی، مورد تفکیک قرار داده است. در باور وی ازآنجاکه وحی در شرایط و بستر تاریخی ویژه‌ای گردآوری و ثبت شده است، پس باید آن را در معرض نقد تاریخی قرار داد و در چنین نقدی توجه به فاصله زمانی تلفظ آیات در زمان پیامبر (ص) و کتابت آن در زمان خلیفۀ‌ سوم پر اهمیت است. بر پایه چنین استدلالی، وی به متن قرآن به‌عنوان یک متن وحیانی و الهی نمی‌نگرد، بلکه آن را متن بشری می‌داند که تاریخمند است. همچنین آرکون قرآن را نصی می‌داند که به روی همه معانی باز است و هیچ تفسیر و تأویلی نمی‌تواند آن را به روی دیگر معانی ببندد و یا معنایی نهایی باشد. با توجه به شبهاتی که در ارتباط با ویژگی‌ها و ماهیت زبان قرآن مطرح شده، تحلیل ریشه‌ای این موضوع ضروری به نظر می‌رسد. در این پژوهش رویکردهای آرکون پیرامون زبان قرآن در چهار محورِ اسطوره‌انگاری قرآن، هرمونتیک فلسفی، نگاه ناسوتی به وحی و تطبیق خصوصیات عهدین بر قرآن کریم، بیان می­شود. در ادامه نیز به شیوه تحلیل محتوا به تبیین قرائت تأویلی و تاریخی آرکون از نص دینی پرداخته شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

An Analysis of Mohammad Arkon's Interpretive and Historical Reading of the Religious Text

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abdollah Mirahmadi 1
  • fatemeh sarlak 2

1 Associate Professor Quran and Hadith Sciences in kharazmi University

2 PHD student PhD student in Rfiat- al Mustafa Tehran Seminary

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Mohamed Arkoun, a contemporary Algerian thinker and Islamologist, has investigated the interpretation and historical reading of religious texts. He believes that the Qur'an was compiled as an oral text in certain political conditions and this affects the understanding of its meanings. Archon emphasizes that interpretation, beyond the traditional interpretation, requires a new and analytical approach that examines the linguistic and cultural structures of the text. Archon's interpretative and historical reading of religious texts deals with the deep examination of religious texts with an emphasis on historical and cultural contexts. The necessity of this approach lies in knowing the hidden dimensions of the meanings of texts and their connection with social and historical realities. The importance of this study lies in reviewing the traditional interpretations and providing new methods of religious discourse analysis, which can help to better understand religion in the contemporary era. With linguistic and semiotic analysis, Archon seeks to open new horizons in the interpretation of religious texts. Based on such reasoning, he does not look at the text of the Qur'an as a divine and revelatory text, but considers it a human text that is historical. Also, Archon considers the Qur'an as a text that is open to all meanings and no interpretation can close it to other meanings or be a final meaning. In other words, meaning is not a divine essence, but it is a human, historical, relative and variable understanding. Therefore, according to the doubts that have been raised in connection with the characteristics and nature of the language of the Qur'an, the root analysis of this issue seems necessary.
In this research, in addition to stating part of Archon's methodological foundations regarding the language of the Qur'an, the following questions are answered:

What is the interpretation and historical reading of Archon with religious texts?
Which methodological methods did Archon use in the field of Quranic language?
What are the consequences of the historical criticism of the Qur'an from Arkon's point of view?
In Archon's point of view, what are the most important standards and modern methods in reading religious texts?

 
Research Hypotheses.
 Archon seeks to provide a new interpretation of the religious text in order to present a historical and interpretive reading of it. While emphasizing the liberation of the Quran from traditional and modern interpretations, he believes in understanding it as a historical text in its time frame.
Archon's four main methods in the field of the language of the Qur'an are: the philosophical hermeneutic approach, empiricism and Nasuti's approach to revelation, mythological approach to the Qur'an, analogy of the Qur'an and the Testaments.
The lack of revelation and humanity in the text of the Qur'an is the most important consequence of the historical criticism of the Qur'an in Archon's belief. With the explanation that from Archon's point of view, the Qur'an has changed its meaning from oral speech (revelation), which was holy and inaccessible, to written text (mushaf) and unholy. Therefore, it is possible to discuss the preference of readings and narratives and their development with the method of historical criticism and reopen the final text.
  Research background
 Although many works have been written about Arkon's thought and character, there is no independent work in the field of "interpretative and historical reading of Muhammad Arkon in the religious text". However, it has been mentioned in some articles and books. In the meantime, the following writings can be considered to some extent in line with future research:
The book "Analytical Reading of Muhammad Arkun's Thoughts (Religion, Text and Truth)" by Mustafa Hassan, translator: Majid Minhaji.
            The article "Modernist Reading of a Religious Text in the Thought of Muhammad Arkun and Nasr Hamed Abu Zaid" was written by Muhammad Khalid al-Shabaab, translated by Majid Minhaji and Muhammad Ali Rashidi. The focus of this article has been on the hermeneutic reading of the religious text according to Archon.
            The article "Criticism and Review of Mohammad Arkun's Reading of Tradition and Modernity" was written by Ali Falah Rafi and Majid Minhaji. In this article, the re-reading of Muhammad Arkon's new religious tradition and project, i.e., "Criticism of Islamic Reason" and its influence on Arkon's historical methodology are stated. The article "Investigation and Analysis of the Influence and Application of Western Approaches in the Reading of Religious Text in the Thought of Mohammad Arkun", was written by Majid Menhaji and Mehdi Sadatinejad. This research is focused on new Western approaches to reading the religious text of Archon.
            Unlike the above writings, in the present article, with a descriptive-analytical method, the analysis of Archon's thoughts in the methodology of Quranic language, historical reading and interpretation style of religious text has been specifically and independently analyzed.
The final result
Archon's goals in the field of critical reading of religious text are: providing solutions to overcome the decline of Islamic civilization, projects of criticism of Islamic reason, applied Islamology and future-oriented quantitative reason. In the meantime, Arkon has benefited from various modern Western approaches and schools in his projects, especially Islamology. His linguistic-semiotic approach is influenced by Dossaurus and Paul Ricoeur. The headlines of his applications in this approach are: conducting objective studies and away from dogma; the hermeneutic distinction between the original scriptures and other texts derived from the hermeneutics of the sacred text; cleansing the language field from dry, peripheral and hereditary connotations; creating a fundamental, scientific and philosophical method for analyzing Islamic thought.
 Also, his application cases in the historical analysis approach are categorized in the following axes: organizing and leveling mechanisms for investigating intellectual challenges; studies related to development and progress and their factors and components; criticism of religious phenomena and theological approach as a valid tool for examining the first texts, i.e. Quran, Sunnah and religious thought; returning the original text to its linguistic level. In general, Arkon, with its historical and interpretive approach, seeks to free the Quran from traditional and modern interpretations to be understood as a historical text in its time frame. Therefore, in Archon's approach, there are three types of anthropological-historical, semiotic-linguistic, and belief-interpretive readings for the Qur'an.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mohammad Arkoon
  • Quranic language
  • religious text
  • interpretive reading
  • historical reading
قرآن کریم.
آرکون، محمد. (1981م ).«الاسلام، التاریخیه و التقدم»،‌ مجله مواقف، شماره 40، ص6-39.
_______. (بی‌تا). «از اجتهاد به نقد عقل اسلامی»، ترجمه مهدی خلجی، وب‌سایت آموزشکده الکترونیکی توانا، آدرس: https://tavaana.org
_______. (1392). تاریخ‌مندی اندیشه اسلامی، ترجمه رحیم حمداوی، تهران: نشر معاصر.
_______. (1996م الف). العلمنۀ والدین الاسلام المسیحیۀ الغرب، بیروت: دارالساقی.
_______. (1996م ب). الفکر الاسلامی قرائۀ علمیۀ؛ ترجمه هاشم صالح، بیروت: المرکزالثقافی العربی.
_______. (2007م). الفکر الاسلامی نقد واجتهاد، ترجمه هاشم صالح، بیروت: دارالساقیۀ.
_______. (1999م الف). الفکرالاصولی واستحالۀ التأصیل، ترجمه هاشم صالح، بیروت: دارالساقی.
_______. (2001م) القرآن من التفسیر المورث الی تحلیل الخطاب الدینی، ترجمه هاشم صالح، بیروت: الطلیعۀ.
_______. (آذر1386).«قرآن را چگونه بخوانیم؟»، ویرایش سیدعلی آقایی، نشریه خردنامه همشهری، ش21، سال 3، ص56-59.
_______. (1996م ). تاریخیۀ الفکر العربی الاسلامی، ترجمه هاشم صالح، بیروت: المرکز الثقافی العربی.
_______. (2000م). قضایا فی نقد العقل الدینی، کیف نفهم الإسلام الیوم؟ ترجمه هاشم صالح، بیروت: دار الطلیعة للطباعة والنشر.
_______. (2009م). نقدالعقل الاسلامی، ترجمه هاشم صالح، بیروت: دارالطلیعۀ.
_______. (1999م). نحو تقییم واستلهام جدیدین للفکر الاسلامی، ترجمه هاشم صالح، بیروت، دارالساقی.
_______. (1996م د). معارک من أجل الأنسنۀ فی السیاقات الإسلامیۀ، ترجمه هاشم صالح، بیروت: دارالساقی.
_______. (1990م). الإسلام، الأخلاق و السیاسه، ترجمه، هاشم صالح، بیروت: مرکز الانماء القومی.
_______. (1992م). من فصیل التفرقه الی فصل المقال: أین هو الفکر الاسلامی المعاصر؟، ترجمه: هاشم صالح، بیروت: دار الساقی.
ابوزید، نصرحامد. (2000م). النص، السلطه، الحقیقه، بیروت: الدارالبیضاء، المرکز الثقافی العربی.
اکبری جدی، صابر. (1393).«تبارشناسی جریان التقاط در مطالعات تفسیری معاصر ایران»، فصلنامه مطالعات تفسیری، شماره 17، سال 5، 129-156.
بوعزه، محمد. (2004م). «رهان التأویل»، مجلة ثقافات کلیة الآداب البحرین، شماره 10، ص17-29.
پالمر، ریچارد. (1377). علم هرمنوتیک، ترجمه محمدسعید حنایی کاشانی، تهران: هرمس.
جوادی آملی، عبدالله. (1386). شریعت در آینه معرفت، قم: نشر اسراء.
حرب، علی. (2000م). نقد النص، بیروت: المرکز الثاقی العربی.
 _______. (1999م ).من العقیده الی الثوره، بیروت: المرکز الثقافی العربی.
خلجی، مهدی. (1377). آرا و اندیشه‌های دکتر محمد ارکون. تهران: سازمان فرهنگ و ارتباطات اسلامی.
ـــــــــــــ. (1389). «محمد ارکون؛ ناقد رادیکال سنت»، بی‌بی‌سی فارسی،
شرفی، عبد الکریم. (2007م). من فلسفات التأویل إلی نظریات القراءۀ، الجزائر: منشورات الاختلاف.
صدیق، شافیه. (2006م). اشکالیه النهوض فی الفکر الاسلامی المعاصر، الجزائر: دار قرطبه للنشر و التوزیع.
طباطبائی، سیدمحمدحسین. (1973م). المیزان فی تفسیر القرآن، بیروت: مؤسسسه الاعلمی للمطبوعات.
عباسی، ولی الله. (1381).«لوازم و پیامدهای نظریه تجربه‌گرایی وحی»، فصلنامه قبسات، شماره 26، سال 7، ص104-122.
عرب‌صالحی،محمد. (1389). «تاریخ‌مندی معرفت»، فصلنامه ذهن، شماره 44، سال 11، ص71-106.
عظمه، عزیز. (1996م) العلمانیۀ من منظور مختلف، بیروت: دراسات الوحدۀ العربیۀ.
لاریجانی، صادق. (1370). معرفت دینی، تهران: مرکز ترجمه و نشر کتاب.
مطهری، مرتضی. (بی‌تا). سیری در سیره نبوی، قم: دفتر انتشارات اسلامی.
مرشدی زاده، علی. (1385). «بازسازی اسلام از مسیر شک دکارتی (مروری بر آراء و اندیشه‌های محمد آرکون متفکر مسلمان الجزایری)»، نشریه اخبار ادیان، شماره 19، سال 4، ص37-39.
موسوی مقدم، محمد و امیدوار، جنان. (1388). «روش‌شناسی تفسیر ادبی تاریخ قرآن در دوره معاصر»، مجله پژوهش دینی، شماره 19، سال 8، ص117-130.
واعظی، احمد. (1376). تحول فهم دین، تهران: مؤسسه فرهنگی اندیشه معاصر.
 
References
Arkoun, Mohammed. (1981). "Islam, Historicism, and Progress", Mawaqif Journal, Issue 40, pp. 6-39. [In Persian]
_______. (n.d.). "From Ijtihad to Critique of Islamic Reason", translated by Mahdi Khalaji, Tavaana Electronic Learning Center website, URL: https://tavaana.org. [In Persian]
_______. (2013). The Historicity of Islamic Thought, translated by Rahim Hamdavi, Tehran: Nashr Moasir. [In Persian]
_______. (1996). Secularism and the Christian Muslim West, Beirut: Dar al-Saqi. [In Arabic]
_______. (1996). Islamic Thought Scientific Reading, translated by Hashem Saleh, Beirut: Arab Cultural Center. [In Arabic]
_______. (2007). Islamic Thought: Critique and Ijtihad, translated by Hashem Saleh, Beirut: Dar al-Saqiya. [In Arabic]
_______. (1999). Islamic Fundamentalism and the Impossibility of Founding, translated by Hashem Saleh, Beirut: Dar al-Saqi. [In Arabic]
_______. (2001). The Quran: From Inherited Interpretation to Analysis of Religious Discourse, translated by Hashem Saleh, Beirut: Al-Tali’a. [In Arabic]
_______. (December 2007). "How Should We Read the Quran?", edited by Seyed Ali Aghai, Khordadnameh Hamshahri, Issue 21, Year 3, pp. 56-59. [In Arabic]
_______. (1996). The Historicity of Arab Islamic Thought, translated by Hashem Saleh, Beirut: Arab Cultural Center. [In Arabic]
_______. (2000). Issues in Critique of Religious Reason, How Do We Understand Islam Today?, translated by Hashem Saleh, Beirut: Dar al-Tali’a for Printing and Publishing. [In Arabic]
_______. (2009). Critique of Islamic Reason, translated by Hashem Saleh, Beirut: Dar al-Tali’a. [In Arabic]
_______. (1999). Towards the Evaluation and Renewal of Islamic Thought, translated by Hashem Saleh, Beirut: Dar al-Saqi. [In Arabic]
_______. (1996). Struggles for Humanization in Islamic Contexts, translated by Hashem Saleh, Beirut: Dar al-Saqi. [In Arabic]
_______. (1990). Islam, Ethics, and Politics, translated by Hashem Saleh, Beirut: National Development Center. [In Arabic]
_______. (1992). From the Division of Difference to the Separation of Argument: Where is Contemporary Islamic Thought?, translated by Hashem Saleh, Beirut: Dar al-Saqi. [In Arabic]
Abou Zaid, Nasr Hamid. (1997). Text, Power, Truth, Beirut: Dar al-Bayza, Arab Cultural Center. [In Arabic]
Akbari Jaddi, Saber. (2014). "Genealogy of the Syncretic Movement in Contemporary Interpretative Studies of Iran", Quarterly Journal of Interpretative Studies, Issue 17, Year 5, pp. 129-156. [In Persian]
Abbasi, Valiollah. (2002). "The Requirements and Consequences of the Experiential Theory of Revelation", Quarterly Journal of Qabasat, Issue 26, Year 7, pp. 104-122. [In Persian]
Arab-Salehi, Mohammad. (2010). "Historicizing Knowledge", Quarterly Journal of Mind, Issue 44, Year 11, pp. 71-106. [In Persian]
Azmeh, Aziz. (1996). Secularism from Different Perspectives, Beirut: Studies in Arab Unity. [In Arabic]
Bouazza, Mohammed. (2004). "The Stakes of Interpretation", Journal of Cultural Studies, College of Arts, Bahrain, Issue 10, pp. 17-29. [In Arabic]
Harb, Ali. (2000). Critique of the Text, Beirut: Arab Cultural Center. [In Arabic]
_______. (1999). From Belief to Revolution, Beirut: Arab Cultural Center. [In Arabic]
Javadi Amoli, Abdullah. (2007). Shari’a in the Mirror of Knowledge, Qom: Esra Publications. [In Persian]
Khalaji, Mahdi. (1998). Ideas and Thoughts of Dr. Mohammed Arkoun, Tehran: Islamic Culture and Communications Organization. [In Persian]
_______. (2010). "Mohammed Arkoun: Radical Critic of Tradition", BBC Persian, URL: https://www.bbc.com/persian/arts/2010/09/100915_u04_arkoun. [In Persian]
Larijani, Sadegh. (1991). Religious Knowledge, Tehran: Book Translation and Publishing Center. [In Persian]
Motahari, Morteza. (n.d.). A Journey into the Prophetic Biography, Qom: Islamic Publications Office. [In Persian]
Morshedizadeh, Ali. (2006). "Reconstructing Islam from the Path of Cartesian Doubt (Reviewing the Views and Thoughts of Mohammed Arkoun, Algerian Muslim Thinker)", Journal of Religious News, Issue 19, Year 4, pp. 37-39. [In Persian]
Mousavi Moghaddam, Mohammad & Omidvar, Janan. (2009). "Methodology of Literary Interpretation of the Quran's History in Contemporary Period", Journal of Religious Research, Issue 19, Year 8, pp. 117-130. [In Persian]
Palmer, Richard. (1998). Hermeneutics, translated by Mohammad Said Hanaei Kashani, Tehran: Hermes. [In Persian]
Sharifi, Abdul Karim. (2007). From Philosophies of Interpretation to Reading Theories, Algeria: Al-Ikhtilaf Publications. [In Arabic]
Sediq, Shafiyeh. (2006). The Problem of Revival in Contemporary Islamic Thought, Algeria: Dar Qurtuba for Publishing and Distribution. [In Arabic]
Tabatabai, Seyed Mohammad Hossein. (1973). Al-Mizan in Quran Interpretation, Beirut: Al-Ilmiah Institute for Publications. [In Arabic]
Vaezi, Ahmad. (1997). Transformation of Religious Understanding, Tehran: Contemporary Thought Institute. [In Persian]