الستی، کیوان. (۱۴۰۳). هوش مصنوعی و کنترل معنادار بشری: سازوکارهای واکنشپذیر به دلایلِ نسبت-به-عامل-خنثی و امکانِ ردگیری عامل(های) مسئول. پژوهشهای فلسفی-کلامی، ۲۶(۴)، ۲۷-۵۴. DOI: 10.22091/jptr.2025.11378.3139
حسینی سورکی، سید محمد. (۱۴۰۳). معنا و معیار عاملیت اخلاقی ماشینهای هوشمند. پژوهشهای فلسفی-کلامی، ۲۶(۴)، ۸۳-۱۰۸. DOI: 10.22091/jptr.2025.12466.3256
عاشوری کیسمی، محمد علی. (۱۴۰۳). همگرایی حریم خصوصی و شفافیت، محدودیتهای طراحی هوش مصنوعی. حکمت و فلسفه، ۲۰(۷۸)، ۴۵-۷۳. DOI: 10.22054/wph.2024.75680.2183
عاشوری کیسمی، محمد علی. پرویزی، مریم و مومنی، سیدمحمدحسن. (۱۴۰۴). پراگماتیسم، اخلاق هوش مصنوعی و سیستمهای اجتماعیفنی. مجله پژوهشهای فلسفی. ۱۹(۵۲)، ۲۸۱-۳۰۰. DOI: 10.22034/jpiut.2025.66643.4060
عاشوری کیسمی، محمد علی. پرویزی، مریم. (۱۴۰۳). بررسی عاملیت اخلاقی هوش مصنوعی عام. پژوهشهای علم و دین، ۱۵(۱)، ۱۲۵-۱۵۱. DOI: 10.30465/srs.2024.49282.2162
عباسی، محمود. تیموری، مهرداد. (۱۴۰۲). مروری بر چالشهای اخلاقی و حقوقی کاربرد هوش مصنوعی در نظام سلامت. مجله اخلاق پزشکی، ۱۷(۴۸)، ۱–۱۱. DOI: 10.22037/mej.v17i48.44053
References
Akata, Z., Balliet, D., de Rijke, M., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Eiben, G., Fokkens, A., Grossi, D., Hindriks, K., Hoos, H., Hung, H., Jonker, C., Monz, C., Neerincx, M., Oliehoek, F., Prakken, H., Schlobach, S., van der Gaag, L., van Harmelen, F., ... Welling, M. (2020). A research agenda for hybrid intelligence: Augmenting human intellect with collaborative, adaptive, responsible, and explainable artificial intelligence. Computer, 53(8), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2020.2996587
Asilomar AI Principles. (2018). Principles developed in conjunction with the 2017 Asilomar conference [Benevolent AI 2017].
Beach, M. W., & Fox, T. (2021). Value sensitive speculative design: Exploring more-than-human relations in the age of climate catastrophe. IxD&A, 51, 111-131. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-051-005
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
Cawthorne, D. (2023). The ethics of drone design: How value-sensitive design can create better technologies. Routledge.
Cenci, A., & Cawthorne, D. (2020). Refining value sensitive design: A (capability-based) procedural ethics approach to technological design for well-being. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(5), 2629-2662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00223-3
Corrêa, N. K., Galvão, C., Santos, J. W., Del Pino, C., Pinto, E. P., Barbosa, C., ... & de Oliveira, N. (2023). Worldwide AI ethics: A review of 200 guidelines and recommendations for AI governance. Patterns, 4(10), Article 100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100857
Corrêa, N. K. (2024). Dynamic normativity: Necessary and sufficient conditions for value alignment. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.11039
de Reuver, M., van Wynsberghe, A., Janssen, M., & Van de Poel, I. (2020). Digital platforms and responsible innovation: Expanding value sensitive design to overcome ontological uncertainty. Ethics and Information Technology, 22(3), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09537-z
European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) (COM 2021 206). https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/documents-register/detail?ref=COM(2021)206&lang=en
Flanagan, M., Howe, D. C., & Nissenbaum, H. (2005). Values at play: Design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 751-760). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055076
Floridi, L. (2023). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Oxford University Press.
Friedman, B., & Hendry, D. G. (2019). Value sensitive design: Shaping technology with moral imagination. MIT Press.
Friedman, B., Hendry, D. G., & Borning, A. (2017). A survey of value sensitive design methods. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 11(2), 63-125. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000015
Gabriel, I. (2020). Artificial intelligence, values, and alignment. Minds and Machines, 30(3), 411-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09539-2
Gabriel, I., & Ghazavi, V. (2022). The challenge of value alignment. In The Oxford handbook of digital ethics (pp. 336-355). Oxford University Press.
Hagendorff, T. (2020). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8
Hagendorff, T. (2024). Deception abilities emerged in large language models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(24), e2317967121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2317967121
Hinds, J., Williams, E. J., & Joinson, A. N. (2020). "It wouldn't happen to me": Privacy concerns and perspectives following the Cambridge Analytica scandal. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 143, Article 102498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102498
Howcroft, J., & Vale, J. (2024). What do stakeholders value? Integrating value sensitive design techniques into an impacts-focused design course. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA).
Jacobs, N. (2021). Values and capabilities: Ethics by design for vulnerable people [Doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology].
Jacobs, N., & Huldtgren, A. (2021). Why value sensitive design needs ethical commitments. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(1), 23-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9467-3
Kroes, P., & Verbeek, P. P. (Eds.). (2014). The moral status of technical artifacts. Springer.
Kudina, O., & Van de Poel, I. (2024). A sociotechnical system perspective on AI. Minds and Machines, 34(3), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-024-09680-2
Manders-Huits, N. (2011). What values in design? The challenge of incorporating moral values into design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9198-2
Miller, B. (2021). Is technology value-neutral? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(1), 53-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919900965
Muller, V. (2021). Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-ai/
Nyholm, S. (2023). Responsibility gaps, value alignment, and meaningful human control over artificial intelligence. In Risk and responsibility in context(pp. 191-213). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003276029-14
Pareto, J., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2024). Social assistive robotics: An ethical and political inquiry through the lens of freedom. International Journal of Social Robotics, 16(8), 1797-1808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-024-01161-x
Peterson, M., & Spahn, A. (2011). Can technological artefacts be moral agents? Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 411-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9244-0
Pitt, J. C. (2013). "Guns don't kill, people kill"; values in and/or around technologies. In P. Kroes & P. P. Verbeek (Eds.), The moral status of technical artefacts (pp. 89-101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7914-3_6
Reijers, W., & Gordijn, B. (2019). Moving from value sensitive design to virtuous practice design. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 17(2), 196-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-10-2018-0080
Russell, S. (2019). Human compatible: AI and the problem of control. Allen Lane.
Rydenfelt, H. (2025). Pragmatism as sociotechnical fallibilism and meliorism. AI & SOCIETY, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02499-0
Shen, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, K., ... & Fan, Y. (2025). Aligning and comparing values of ChatGPT and human as learning facilitators: A value-sensitive design approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(4), 1391-1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13562
Srivatsa, N., Kaliarnta, S., & Kormelink, J. G. (2017). Responsible innovation: From MOOC to book. TU Delft OPEN Publishing.
Star, S. L., & Bowker, G. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.
Umbrello, S. (2021). The ecological turn in design: Adopting a posthumanist ethics to inform value sensitive design. Philosophies, 6(2), Article 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies6020029
Umbrello, S., & De Bellis, A. F. (2018). A value-sensitive design approach to intelligent agents. In Artificial intelligence safety and security (pp. 395-409). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Umbrello, S., & Van de Poel, I. (2021). Mapping value sensitive design onto AI for social good principles. AI and Ethics, 1(3), 283-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00038-3
UNICEF. (2021). Policy guidance on AI for children. United Nations Children's Fund.
Van de Poel, I. (2016). An ethical framework for evaluating experimental technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(3), 667-686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9724-3
Van de Poel, I. (2023). AI, control and unintended consequences: The need for meta-values. In Rethinking technology and engineering: Dialogues across disciplines and geographies (pp. 117-129). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25233-4_9
Van de Poel, I., & Kroes, P. (2014). Can technology embody values? In P. Kroes & P. P. Verbeek (Eds.), The moral status of technical artefacts (pp. 103-124). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7914-3_7
Van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P., & van de Poel, I. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of ethics and values in technological design: Sources, theory, values and application domains. Springer.
Veluwenkamp, H., & van den Hoven, J. (2023). Design for values and conceptual engineering. Ethics and Information Technology, 25(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09675-6
Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009). Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press.
Watson, D. S., Mökander, J., & Floridi, L. (2024). Competing narratives in AI ethics: A defense of sociotechnical pragmatism. AI & SOCIETY, 3163-3185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02128-2
Werthner, H. (2020). The Vienna manifesto on digital humanism. In Digital transformation and ethics (pp. 338-357). Ecowin.
Wiener, N. (1960). Some moral and technical consequences of automation. Science, 131, 1355–1358. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.131.3410.1355
Wolf, M. J., Miller, K., & Grodzinsky, F. S. (2017). Why we should have seen that coming: Comments on Microsoft's Tay "experiment," and wider implications. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 47(3), 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3144592.3144598
Young, M. T., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2024). Keeping things going: Maintenance and philosophy of technology. In M. T. Young & M. Coeckelbergh (Eds.), Maintenance and philosophy of technology: Keeping things going (pp. 1-36). Routledge.
Zuboff, S. (2023). The age of surveillance capitalism. In W. Longhofer & D. Winchester (Eds.), Social theory re-wired: New connections to classical and contemporary perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 203-213). Routledge.
Alpsancar, S. (2023, May). What is AI ethics? Ethics as means of self-regulation and the need for critical reflection. In International Conference on Computer Ethics (Vol. 1, No. 1). http://journals.library.iit.edu/index.php/CEPE2023/article/view/227/233
Andreessen, M. (2023, October 16). The techno-optimist manifesto. Andreessen Horowitz. https://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist-manifesto/
References [In Persian & In Arabic]
Abbasi, M., & Teymouri, M. (2024). A Review of the Ethical and Legal Challenges of Using Artificial Intelligence in the Health System. akhlāq-I Pizishkī i.E., Medical Ethics, 17(48), 1–11. doi: 10.22037/mej.v17i48.44053 [in Persian]
Alasti, K. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Meaningful Human Control: Agent-Neutral-Reason-Responsive Mechanisms and the Possibility of Tracing Responsible Agent(s). Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 26(4), 27-54. doi: 10.22091/jptr.2025.11378.3139 [in Persian]
Ashouri Kisomi, M. A. & Parvizi, M. (2024). Investigation of the Ethical Agency of Artificial General Intelligence. Science and Religion Studies, 15(1), 125-151. doi: 10.30465/srs.2024.49282.2162 [in Persian]
Ashouri Kisomi, M. A. (2024). Convergence of privacy and transparency, limitations of artificial intelligence design. Wisdom And Philosophy, 20(78), 45-73. doi: 10.22054/wph.2024.75680.2183 [in Persian]
Ashouri-Kisomi, M. A., Parvizi, M. & Momeni, S. M. H. (2025). Pragmatism, the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Sociotechnical Systems. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 19(52), 281-300. doi: 10.22034/jpiut.2025.66643.4060 [in Persian]
Hoseini Souraki, S. M. (2024). The Meaning and Criteria of Moral Agency in Intelligent Machines. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 26(4), 83-108. doi: 10.22091/jptr.2025.12466.3256 [in Persian]
