Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran

2 philosophy

Abstract

One of the main issues in explaining the phenomenon of diversity of religions in the world is the issue of religions ranking; i.e. the question of whether religions are essentially comparable or not! And if it is comparable, what is the criterion and criterion of this comparison? It seems that the border between two different positions in explaining the phenomenon of religious plurality, namely relativism and religious pluralism, comes from the accuracy of the issue of religions ranking. In this article, we will speak of two main representatives of these two trends by proposing and examining this problem and among the religious relativists we refer to Ernest Troeltsch and to John Hick from religious pluralism. This article seeks to put these two theories together and remind them of their similarities and reveal their fundamental differences. Briefly, it can be noted that the major similarity between Troeltsch and Hick is to rely on cultural categories in the consistency of religious awareness, while the fundamental difference between them is the observation of objectivity or subjectivity in their grading criteria. In the end, Hick claims that although religions are comparable in principle, but practically the result of this comparing is the equivalence of religion’s Truth-claims, while Troeltsch says it's basically impossible to compare religions, اowever, in his original statements, he clearly states that in practice, Christianity is superior to other religions. Of course, in his later remarks, he reviews this result and claims that religions are only relative in absolute terms and he claims absolute religions are relative only.

Keywords

اکرمی، سید امیر. (1391). «زندگی که کرده‌ام. زندگی که خواهم کرد؛ زندگینامة مختصر جان هیک».نشریة مهرنامه. ش 21. صص 189-191.
تریسی، دیوید. (1374). «الهیات تطبیقی». ترجمة بهاءالدین خرمشاهی. فصلنامة فلسفی، ادبی و فرهنگی ارغنون. س 2. ش 5 و 6. صص 272-291.
ریتر، یوآخیم، کارلفرید گروندر و گابریل گتفرید (1391). فرهنگ‌نامه تاریخی مفاهیم فلسفه: الهیات. ترجمة فریده فرنودفر. ویرایش سیدمحمدرضا بهشتی. تهران: مؤسسة پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفه ایران.
ریچادرز، گلین. (1384). رویکردهای مختلف به پلورالیزم دینی (به سوی الهیات ناظر به همة ادیان). ترجمة رضا گندمی نصرآبادی و احمدرضا مفتاح. قم: مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات ادیان و مذاهب.
مک‌گراث، آلیستر. (1393). درسنامة الهیات مسیحی، بخش نخست: دوره‌ها، چهره‌ها، منابع و شیوه‌ها. ترجمة بهروز حدادی. قم: انتشارات دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب.
هیک، جان. (1386). مباحث پلورالیسم دینی. ترجمة عبدالرحیم گواهی. تهران: نشر علم.
ـــــــــ . (1390). فلسفة دین. ترجمة بهروز سالکی. قم: انتشارات بین‌المللی الهدی.
ـــــــــ. (1391). «فرضیة کثرت‌گرا (فصل چهاردهم از کتاب تفسیری از دین)». ترجمة بهروز سالکی. نشریة مهرنامه. ش 21. صص 192-196.
Hick, John. (1985). Problems of Religious Pluralism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
________ . (1992). “The Non-Absoluteness of Christianity”.Disputed Questions in Theology and the Philosophy of Religion. John Hick (auth.). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 77-101.
________ . (2001). “The Theological Challenge of Religious Pluralism”. Christianity and Other Religions, Edi. Hick, John & Brian Hebblethwaite. Oxford: Oneworld Publications. Pp. 156-172.
Johnson, Roger A. (1962), “Troeltsch on Christianity and Relativism”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. Vol. 1. No. 2. Pp 220-223.
Mancintosh, Douglas C. (1919). “Troeltsch’s Theory of Religious Knowledge”. The American Journal of Theology. Vol. 1. No. 3. Pp 274-289.
Quigley, Michael A. (1983). “Ernst Troeltsch and the Problem of the Historical Absolute”. The Heythrop Journal. Vol. 24. No. 1. Pp 19-37.
Schaper, Eva. (1967). “Ernst Troeltsch”. The Encyclopedia of Philosophy VIII. New York: Macmillan. Pp 162-3.
Troeltsch, Ernst. (1999). “The Place of Christianity among the World Religions”. Christianity and Plurality: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Edited by Richard J. Plantinga. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publication. Pp. 209-222.
_____________ . (2005). The Absoluteness of Christianity and the History of Religions. Trans. David Reid. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.
_____________ . (2007). “Historical and Dogmatic Method in Theology”. Religion in History. Trans. James Luther Adams, Minnesota: Augsburg Fortress Publishers. Pp. 11-32.