Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Philosophy, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.

2 PhD Candidate of Philosophy, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Human is an end in itself; this is Kant’s second formulation of categorical imperative, which has proved to be the most practical one for him. What is meant by "end in itself" as opposed to being "merely as a means"? How can we apply this formula in practice? What is the relationship between this formula, which appears to be teleological, and consequentialism and utilitarianism in ethics? These three basic questions form the focus of the present paper. However, our emphasis is on the third one. First, we will briefly explicate the second formula. Then, we will discuss the application of this formula as well as the negative and positive judgments drawn from it. Finally, we will refer to an interpretation by David Cummiskey who argues that a normative consequential moral system can be deduced from this formula. This interpretation will be meticulously examined.

Keywords

استوارت میل، جان. (1388).  فایده‌گرایی، ترجمۀ مرتضی مردیها، ،تهران: نی.
جانسون، رابرت.ن. ( 1395).  فلسفۀ اخلاق کانت، دانشنامۀ استانفورد، مهدی اخوان، تهران: ققنوس.
Cummiskey , David. (1990). “Kantian Consequentialism, Ethics, Vol. 100, No. 3 (Apr., 1990). pp. 586-615, The University of Chicago Press
cummiskey, David. (1996). Kantian Consequentialism, Oxford: Oxford.
Dean, Richard.(2000).  “Cummiskey's Kantian Consequentialism, Utilitas, vol. 12, no 3, March 2000, Cambridge.
English Hill, Thomas.( 2010). JR, Kant’s Tugendlehre as normative ethics, Kant's Metaphysics of Morals A Critical Guide, ED: Lara Denis, Cambridge: Cambridge university press
Hare, R. M.( 1998) Sorting Out Ethics, Oxford: Oxford.
Kant Immanuel, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, (1785), TR: Mary Gregor, Cambridge: Cambridge university press
Kant Immanuel, Critique of practical reason, (1788), TR: Mary Gregor, Cambridge: Cambridge university press
Kant Immanuel, Critique of the power of judgment, (1790), TR: Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews, Cambridge: Cambridge university press
Kant Immanuel, Metaphysics of Morals, (1797), TR: Mary Gregor, Cambridge: Cambridge university press
Kant, Immanuel (1797B). On a supposed right to lie from philanthropy, TR: Mary Gregor, Cambridge: Cambridge university press
Marshall, Thomas.(2003). "The Ambiguity of Kant’s Concept of Happiness", Reason Papers, Vol. 26,p21-28.
O neil,  Onora.( 1985). A Simplified Account of Kant's Ethics, Excerpted in J.E. White (ed.), Contemporary Moral Problems, 6th ed, St. Paul, MN: West Publishing
Paton, H. J. (1946). Categorical imperative, oxford
Schroeder, H. H. (1940). “Some Common Misinterpretations of the Kantian Ethics, The philosophical Review, Vol. 49, No. 4, Jul., 1940, pp 424-446, Duke University Press.
Sedgwick, Sally. )2008(. Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge university press
Timmermann, Jens. (2005). “Why Kant could not have been a utilitarian, Utilitas, Vol. 17 no. 3 (243-264),  Cambridge
Wood, Allen. (1999). Kant's Ethical Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge university press
Wood, Allen. (2004). The Final Form of Kant’s Practical Philosophy, Kant's Metaphysics of Morals Interpretative essays, ED: Mark Timmons, oxford: oxford.
Wood, Allen. (2006). Kant’s Formulations of the Moral Law, A Companion to Kant, ED: Graham Bird, Blackwell.