Language and Knowledge in  Plato’s Cratylus

Shafibeik, Iman

doi:10.22054/wph.2016.6731

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

iman shafibeik

https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2016.6731

Abstract

This article is an attempt to explain the relation of language to knowledge according to Plato’s Cratylus. In this dialogue, Plato examines and then refuses the two views concerning the correctness of words: conventionalism (denoting that correctness of each word is by convention) and naturalism (denoting that each word reveals the nature of the thing named by it). Moreover, he offers a series of etymologies seemingly to show that we should not rely on analyzing the words in search of truth. Finally, he concludes that we should learn the truth independently of words. This negative conclusion, specially due to its brevity in comparison with the whole dialogue, gives rise to different interpretations in the light of Plato’s other works. The result of this research is that, according to Cratylus, any method connected to language falls short in providing pure knowledge.

Keywords

References

لطفی تبریزی، محمدحسن (مترجم) (1367)، دورة آثار افلاطون (ج 2)، خوارزمی.

J. L. Ackrill, (1999), ‘Language and Reality in Plato's Cratylus’, in G. Fine (ed.), Plato. 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, Oxford University Press: 125–42.

F. Ademollo, (2011), The Cratylus of Plato: A commentary, Cambridge University Press.

J. Barnes, (ed.) (1991),Complete Works of Aristotle (vol. ii), Princeton University Press.

Barney, R. (2005), Names and Nature in Plato'sCratylus, Routledge.

Burnet J. (ed.) (1900), Platonis opera(vol. i), Oxford.

J. M. Cooper, (ed.) (1997), Plato: The Complete Works, D. S. Hutchinson (assoc. ed.), Hackett.

W. K. C. Guthrie, (1978), A History of Greek Philosophy (vol. v: The Later Plato and the Academy), Cambridge University Press.

E. Hamilton, and H. Cairns,(eds.) (1973), The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Pantheon Books.

S. Keller, (2000), ‘An Interpretation of Plato's Cratylus’, Phronesis 45: 284–305.

T. Kouremenos, and G. M. Parássoglou, and K. Tsantsanoglou, (eds.) (2006), The Derveni Papyrus, Olschki.

A. Laks, and G. W. Most, (eds.) (2001), Studies on the Derveni Papyrus, Oxford University Press.

A. W. Nightingale, (2003), ‘Subtext and Subterfuge in Plato's Cratylus’, in A. N. Michelini (ed.), Plato as Author: The Rhetoric of Philosophy, Brill: 223–40.

M. W. Riley, (2005), Plato's Cratylus: Argument, Form, and Structure, Rodopi.

M. Schofield, (2006), ‘The denouement of the Cratylus’, in M. Schofield and M. Nussbaum (eds.), Language and Logos: Studies in ancient Greek philosophy (presented to G. E. L. Owen), Cambridge University Press: 61–81.

D. Sedley, (2003), Plato'sCratylus,Cambridge University Press.

_______ (2006), ‘Plato on Language’, in H. H. Benson (ed.), A companion to Plato, Blackwell: 214–27.

Wisdom And Philosophy

Language and Knowledge in Plato’s Cratylus

References

References

Volume 11, Issue 44 - Serial Number 44
January 2016
Pages 61-78

Language and Knowledge in Plato’s Cratylus

References

References

Volume 11, Issue 44 - Serial Number 44January 2016Pages 61-78

Volume 11, Issue 44 - Serial Number 44
January 2016
Pages 61-78