Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Abstract
In history of philosophy, the universals are considered to be one of the most important and controversial problems. A group of thinkers has highlighted   to be mark of difference between human and animal while some others have degraded it to a mere name. Importance of this issue was different in various ages but in medieval ages it enjoyed more importance. Locke and then Berkley, who considered to be the heir of medieval philosophy, inevitably discussed it and propounded new theories. This article is an attempt to discuss these theories.  At first, Locke's theory and its problem were treated and then Berkley's theory was explored with reference to its strong and weak points. Then a middle way is propounded to describe the universals as viewed by both philosophers including their strong points.

Keywords

هیلاری استنیلند، (1383) کلی ها، نجف دریابندری، تهران، نشر کارنامه.
جرج بارکلی، (1375)، رساله در اصول علم انسانی و سه گفت و شنود، منوچهر بزرگمهر، تهران، مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
سید محمد حکاک، (1390) فلسفه تجربی انگلستان، تهران، سمت.
فردریک کاپلستون، (1387) تاریخ فلسفه ج5، امیر جلال‌الدین اعلم، تهران، سروش.
ای.جی لو، (1386) راهنمای کتاب جستار در باب فاهمه بشری، ابوالفضل حقیری، تهران، حکمت.
 
Jonathan Bennet, (1991) Locke Berkley Hume (Central Themes), Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Nino B. Cocchiarella, (2007) Formal ontology and conceptual Realism, Netherland, Springer.
Jonathan Dancy, (1987) Berkley: An Introduction, Oxford, B. Blackwell.
John Locke, (1991) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Peter H. Nidditch, Oxford, Oxford.
e.j. Lowe, (2005) Locke, New York, Routledge.
 
C. C. W. Taylor, (1978) "Berkeley's Theory of Abstract Ideas", PHILOSPPHICAL QUARTERLY, vol.28, No.111, 97-115.
J.O. Urmson, (1982) Berkley, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
G. J. Warnock, (1953) Berkley, Oxford, Penguin Books.