Investigation And Criticism Of The Inherent Dualism Of Soul And Body In Descartes' Thought With The Approach Of Transcendent Wisdom

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Master Student of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, University of Tabriz

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy and Theology, Faculty Member of Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract
The soul and the body and the relationship between these two essences are among the problems of the philosophy of mind, and there are traces of this topic in all philosophical schools. The philosophy of Descartes and transcendent wisdom are also among these schools, according to the principles of both schools, these two essences have duality, with the difference that Descartes believes in the inherent dualism of soul and body, and transcendent wisdom proposes the gradational dualism of these two essences. but Descartes' thought has been criticized by many philosophical schools due to the impossibility of connecting two contradictory essences. Therefore, examining and criticizing the inherent dualism of soul and body in Descartes' thought with the approach of transcendent wisdom can reveal many weaknesses of Descartes' view in this field, provide appropriate solutions to overcome these weaknesses and convince the critics.
In this article, through descriptive-analytical method, first we examined the inherent dualism of soul and body in Descartes' thought, then Descartes' solutions on the union of soul and body are presented, and finally, we criticized the inherent duality of soul and body in Descartes' thought with the approach of transcendent wisdom and solutions are presented in this field, according to these solutions, by accepting the existence of the material characteristics of the soul, at the beginning of creation, the soul and the body can be considered united with each other, and the independence of the soul from the body can be proposed at the time.

Keywords

Subjects

Cottingham, john. (1993). A Descartes's Dictionary, Oxford
Churchland, P.Patricia. (1989). Neurocomputational perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Cottingham, john. (1986). Descartes, Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.
Descartes, Rene. (1996). Meditations on First Philosophy; with, selected from the objections and replies, tran and ed. John Cottingham; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Descartes, Rene. (2006). A Discourse on the Method, trans. Ian Maclean, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Descartes, Rene. (2007). Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and Rene Descartes: the Correspondence Between Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and Rene Descartes, ed. and trans. Lisa Shapiro, Chicago: the University of Chicago Press
Donkoh, Sylvester. (2016). Descartes’ Method, Mind and Body, Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), 3(1): Pp65-72, http://www.onlinejournal.in.
Judycki, Stanislaw. (2021). Descartes, Kant, and Swinburne on Human Soul, Roczniki, Filozoficzne, LXIX(1): Pp45-56
Robinson, Howard. (2021). The Revival Of Substance Dualism, Roczniki Filozoficzne, LXIX(1): 33-43
References [In Persian]
Descartes, René. (2006). Meditations on First Philosophy, trans. Ahmad Ahmadi, Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian]
Descartes, René. (1997). Principles of Philosophy, trans. Manouchehr Sane’ei Darrehbidi, Tehran: Alhoda International Publishing. [In Persian]
Descartes, René. (1997). The Passions, in: Descartes’ Philosophy, trans. Manouchehr Sane’ei Darrehbidi, Tehran: Alhoda International Publishing. [In Persian]
Descartes, René. (2011). Descartes’ Philosophy, trans. Manouchehr Sane’ei Darrehbidi, Tehran: Alhoda International Publishing. [In Persian]
Descartes, René. (2007). Objections and Replies, trans. and commentary by Ali Mousaie Afzali, Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi Publishing. [In Persian]
Lahiji, Abd al-Razzaq. (n.d.). Shawariq al-Ilham fi Sharh Tajrid al-Kalam, Isfahan: Mahdavi Publishing. [In Persian]
Mulla Sadra. (2001). Al-Mabda’ wa al-Ma’ad, Qom: Maktabat al-I’lam al-Islami. [In Persian]
Mulla Sadra. (2000). Al-Arshiyyah, Beirut: Al-Tarikh al-Arabi Institute. [In Persian]
Mulla Sadra. (1999). Al-Hikmah al-Muta‘aliyah fi’l-Asfar al-‘Aqliyyah al-Arba‘ah, Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-Arabi. [In Persian]
Mulla Sadra. (1996). Majmu‘at al-Rasa’il al-Tis‘ah, ed. and annotated by Hamed Naji Esfahani, Tehran: Hekmat Publishing. [In Persian]
Motahhari, Morteza. (1995). Collected Works, Tehran: Sadra Publications. [In Persian]
Mousazadeh, Isa. (2021). Soul and Body, Qom: Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy. [In Persian]
Obudiyat, Abdolrasoul. (2006). An Introduction to the System of Sadrian Philosophy, Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian]
Paykin, Richard; Stroll, Avrum. (1994). Introduction to Philosophy, trans. Dr. Mojtabavi, Tehran: Hekmat. [In Persian]
Rezazadeh Joudi, Mehdi; Rezazadeh Joudi, Mohammad Kazem. (2019). A Critical Review of the Causal Interaction of Soul and Body in Cartesian Philosophy, Zehn Quarterly, 79: pp. 207–230, https://zehn.iict.ac.ir/article_37570.html [In Persian]