Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
Philosophy Department, Shahid Beheshti University
Abstract
Semmelweis's research method in identifying the cause of puerperal fever in mothers has attracted the attention of philosophers of science for several decades. Some have used the reasonableness of the Semmelweis method to compare scientific methodology, and some have used this research to describe and evaluate scientific inference. However, despite the special attention paid to Semmelweis's research, there is still no consensus to explain his methodology.
In this article, after introducing the research of Semmelweis, we address the challenging question of whether the description of inference through the best explanation of Lipton and Holmesian inference-Bird's is sufficient in the reasonable reconstruction of the stages of Semmelweis's research. Is the inferential method of Semmelweis in finding the best explanation for the cause of puerperal fever consistent with the description of Lipton and Bird?
The results of the present research show that the description of Lipton and Bird is insufficient in the reasonable reconstruction of the research stages of Semmelweis Because their description of the stages of Semmelweis's research is not compatible with historical documents. However, according to Schupbach's approach, we argued that the ineffectiveness of a case example does not indicate the unreasonableness of an inference in general. Therefore, we concluded that despite the interest of Lipton and Bird, Semmelweis's research will not be a good historical example for the justification of inference through the best explanation and Holmesian inference. Semmelweis's case is the worst example for the best justification of it.
Keywords
Main Subjects
)