Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Education, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

Boredom or the lack of attractiveness of life experiences has been one of the inevitable sufferings of mankind since the beginning of history, which intensified with the industrial revolution and modernism. Meanwhile, different thinkers have tried to explain the why and how of this phenomenon and the way to overcome it. Modern solutions emphasize taking refuge in the fashion and entertainment industry, diversifying experiences, and creating objective changes outside of the individual's existence to get rid of boredom. But Søren Kierkegaard, criticizing modern and secular solutions, believes that boredom is other than unemployment and a form of akadia, which is an emotional sign of a person's lack of attention to God in performing religious duties. According to Kierkegaard, boredom is demonic and the result of choosing a hedonistic or ethical life, and the way to avoid it is to choose religious life and self-improvement through the desire to create positive moral properties such as patience, perseverance, hope, faith, love and happiness. Also, his other strategy to avoid boredom is to adopt a subjective, aesthetic and abstract view of the phenomena of the world. From his point of view, modern solutions lead a person to an endless effort to change the content of his external world by analyzing and interpreting the feeling of boredom incorrectly. Unaware that the root of solving the problem is changing the inner world through adopting an aesthetic view and poetic revision of experiences.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Den Dulk, A& Boswell, M.(2014). "Boredom, Irony, and Anxiety: Wallace and the Kierkegaardian View of the Self". David Foster Wallace and “The Long Thing”: New Essays on the Novels, 43-60.‏https://www.allarddendulk.nl/docs/DenDulk_BoredomIronyAnxietyWallace&Kierkegaard_PreFinal-AuthorCopy.pdf
Eastwood, John D; Dankert, James (2021), The Psychology of Boredom; Description of human boredom, translated by Maryam Heydari.Tehran: Novin Publishing. [in Persian]
Elpidorou, A. (2022)."The moral significance of boredom". The Moral Psychology of Boredom, 15, 1.‏[https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781786615381/The-Moral-Psychologyof-Boredom]
Fitzgerald, F. S. (1945). The crack-up. New York: New Directions Books.
Gabriel, M. (2010). Subjectivity and religious truth in the philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard.Georgia: Mercer University Press.‏
Gary, K. H. (2013). "Boredom, Contemplation and Liberation". Philosophy of Education 2013, 427-435.
https://educationjournal.web.illinois.edu/archive/index.php/pes/article/view/4040.pdf
Goodstein, Elizabeth S.(2005) Experience without Qualities: Boredom and Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Harries, K. (2010). Between Nihilism and Faith: A Commentary on Either/Or. New Haven:de Gruyter.‏
Kangas, D. J. (2007). Kierkegaard's Instant: On Beginnings. Indiana:Indiana University Press.‏
Kemp, R. (2015). “A” the Aesthete: Aestheticism and the Limits of Philosophy. In Volume 17: Kierkegaard's Pseudonyms (pp. 25-50).London: Routledge.‏
Kierkegaard, S. (1852). The rotation of crops: A venture in a theory of social prudence. London: Penguin.
Kierkegaard, S. (2013a). Kierkegaard's Writings, II, Volume 2: The Concept of Irony, with Continual Reference to Socrates/Notes of Schelling's Berlin Lectures (Vol. 35). Princeton: Princeton University Press.‏
Kierkegaard, S. (2013b). Kierkegaard's Writings, VIII, and Volume 8: Concept of Anxiety: A Simple Psychologically Orienting Deliberation on the Dogmatic Issue of Hereditary Sin (Vol. 18). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kierkegaard, s. (2013c).Kierkegaard's Writings, XI, Volume 11: Stages on Life's Way (Vol. 27). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kierkegaard, S., & Thomte, R. (1982). The concept of anxiety: A simple psychologically orienting deliberation on the dogmatic issue of hereditary sin.NewYork: Religious Studies, 18(3).‏DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412500014268.
Kierkegaard, Søren. (1987) .Either /or: Part I. Trans. and ed. Howard and Edna Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kierkegaard, Søren. (1987).Either /or: Part II. Trans. and ed. Howard and Edna Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lippitt, John and C. Stephen Evans,(2023)"Søren Kierkegaard", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL =
<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/kierkegaard/>.
Mackey, Louis (1971) Kierkegaard a Kind of Poet .Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press,
McCarthy, V. A. (1978). The phenomenology of moods in Kierkegaard. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.‏
McDonald, W. (2009). "Kierkegaard’s demonic boredom". In Essays on boredom and modernity (pp. 61-84). Leiden: Brill.‏DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042032125_004
Raposa, Michael L. (1999) Boredom and the Religious Imagination. Virginia: University of Virginia Press.
Ros Velasco, J. (2023)."Contemporary myths on boredom". Switzerland: Frontiers inSociology, 8, 1183875.
Schopenhauer, Arthur (2008) Studies in Pessimism, On Human Nature, and Religion: A Dialogue, Etc. Translated by Bailey Saunders, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Svendsen, L. (2005). A philosophy of boredom. London: Reaktion Books.‏
Wadhams, L. (2020). Kierkegaard's Theory of Boredom and the Development of Personality. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2020.225