Le Corbusier, play, Bataille Interpreting Ronchamp chapel according to the concept of formless in Bataille philosophy

Saboori, Negar; Nasri, Amir

doi:10.22054/wph.2020.55271.1893

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Negar Saboori ¹
Amir Nasri ²

¹ Ph.D. Candidate in Philosophy of Art, Tehran University of Art , Tehran, Iran.

² Associate Professor of Philosophy of Art, Allamah Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2020.55271.1893

Abstract

Le Corbusier and Bataille -who was against architecture- seem to be two opposing figures. But there is a relation between the two. Building Ronchamp, le Corbusier was reading The Accursed Share of Bataille. ‘Le jeu or play’ is one of the common concepts in the theoretical framework of these two, which can be slightly different. In this paper we will look for this relation considering le Corbusier’s Ronchamp chapel. In Ronchamp le Corbusier brings the contrast-based play to the beginning of architecture: What is architecture and not architecture at the same time. In Ronchamp Le Corbusier continued with the process of rotating axes which he had started in 1920s; the same measure which Bataille takes in ‘Acéphale’. The play in Ronchamp is ‘changing Thing into no-thing’ and ‘sacrificing’ architecture; concepts which are found in general economy and Bataille’s works. Ultimately Ronchamp plays with the common organization of architecture, both in reference and form. This is just what Bataille admires in works he considers as the cathedrals of the time or beyond: Manet’s works and Lascaux Cave Hall. In Le Corbusier’s not-well-understood concept of ‘machine of life’ the process of architecture is very close to the ‘formless’ process of Bataille: Playing of intensities that reaches to its acme in Ronchamp. By sacrificing what he loves, Le Corbusier, as he imagines, sits on the place of ‘Sovereign’ of Bataille.

Keywords

References

پروست، مارسل (۱۳۹۸الف). زمان بازیافته، ترجمۀ مهدی سحابی، تهران: مرکز.

دریدا، ژاک (۱۳۹۵). نوشتار و تفاوت. ترجمۀ عبدالکریم رشیدیان. تهران: نی.

سینربرینک، رابرت (۱۳۹۵). شناخت هگل‌گرایی. ترجمۀ مهدی بهرامی. تهران: لاهیتا.

نیچه، فردریش ویلهلم (۱۳۹۱). چنین گفت زرتشت. ترجمۀ مسعود انصاری. تهران: جامی.

Agostini, Giulia (2016). “Nietzsche”, Georges Bataille Key Concepts, Eds. Mark Hewson, Marcus Coelen, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 56-64.

Bataille, Georges (1929). “Architecture”, in: Documents. no. 1.

_____________ (1929). “L’Informe”, in: Documents, no. 1.

_____________ (1955a). Lascaux or the Birth of Art, trans. Austryn Wainhouse, Geneva: Skira.

_____________ (1955b). Manet. trans. Austryn Wainhouse & James Emmons, Geneva: Skira.

______________ (1985). “Obelisk”, in: Visions Of Excess - Selected Writings, 1927-1939, ed. & trans. Allan Stoekl, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

_____________ (1986). Eroticism, Death and Sensuality, San Francisco: City Lights Publishers.

_____________ (1988). Inner Experience, trans. Bruce Boon, Leslie Anne Boldt, New York: State University of New York Press.

_____________ (1988). The Accursed Share, Vol. 1 (Consumption), trans. Robert Hurley, Cambridge: Zone Books.

_____________ (1989). Theory of Religion, Cambridge: Zone Books.

_____________ (1990). “Hegel, Death and Sacrifice”, ed. Allan Stoekl, Yale French Studies: On Bataille. No 78, pp. 9- 28.

_____________ (1993). The Accursed Share, Vols. 2 & 3 (The History of Eroticism and Sovereignty), Cambridge: MIT Press.

_____________ (2004a). on Nietzsche, trans. Bruce Boone, London: Continuum.

_____________ (2004b). Unfinished System of Nonknowledge, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

Cache, Bernard (1994, March April). “The Eagle and the Serpent”, in: ANY: Architecture New York. No. 5, Lightness, pp. 10-11.

Coll, Jaime (1996, Summer). “structure and play in Le Corbusier Architecture”, in: AA Files, No. 31, pp. 3-14.

Duboy, Philip (1987). “Bataille, Georges”, in: Le Corbusier une encyclopédie. Eds. Jacques Lucan, Paris: Centre Georges Pompidou.

Gemerchak, Christopher M. (2003). The Sunday of the Negative, Reading Bataille, Reading Hegel, New York: State University of New York Press.

Gorlin, Alexander (2005). “The ghost in the machine”, in: Surrealism and Architecture. Ed. Thomas Mical. Oxon: Routledge.

Hegarty, Paul (2008, Winter). “On Fire: The City’s Accursed Share”, in: log, No. 11, pp. 49-62.

Hollier, Denis (1992). Against Architecture. Trans. Betsy Wing. MIT Press, Cambridge.

Jencks, Charles (1975). Le Corbusier and the tragic view of architecture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Lahiji, Nadir (1996, Sep.). “the gift of the open hand: le Corbusier Reading Georges Bataille’s La Part Maudite”, in: Journal of Architecture Education, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 50-67.

__________ (2005). “… the Gift of time: le Corbusier reading Bataille”, in: Surrealism and Architecture. Editor: Thomas Mical. Oxon: Routledge.

Le Corbusier (1999). Le Corbusier Talks with Students from the Schools of Architecture. trans. Pierre Chase. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.

__________ (1975). The City of Tomorrow and Its Planning. Cambridge: MIT Press.

__________ (1987). Towards a New Architecture. trans. Frederick Etchells. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.

Mindrup, M. (2015, Nov.). “La réaction poétique of a prepared mind”, in: Le Corbusier, 50 Years later International Congress. Valencia.

Nietzsche, Friedrich (1998). Twilight of the Idols_ or How to Philosophize with a Hamme. trans. Duncan Large. New York: Oxford University Press.

Nioche, Claire (2016). “Sovereignty”, in: Georges Bataille Key Concepts. eds. Mark Hewson, Marcus Coelen: Oxon: Routledge, pp. 102-108.

Pauly, Danièle (2008). The Chapel at Ronchamp, trans. Sarah Parsons. Paris: Fondation Le Corbusier & Birkhäuser Basel.

Petit, Jean (1961). le livre de Ronchamp. Paris: Les Cahiers de forces vives / Editec.

Poppenberg, Gerhard (2016). “Inner Experience”, in: Georges Bataille Key Concepts. Eds. Mark Hewson, Marcus Coelen, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 92- 100.

Stoekl, Allan (1990). Yale French Studies: On Bataille. New Haven: Yale University.

_________ (1990). “Truman’s Apotheosis: Bataille, “planisme” and heedlessness”, in: Yale French Studies: On Bataille, New Haven: Yale University, No. 78.

Tafuri, Manferedo (1987). “machine et mémoire: the city in the work of Le Corbusier”, in: Le Corbusier, Ed. H. Allen Brooks. trans. Stephen Sartarelli. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Teodosio, Annarita (2015, Nov.), “The eye of the architect, Le Corbusier and the photograph: demonstrate, learn, remember”, in: Le Corbusier, 50 Years later International Congress. Valencia.

Turner, Paul (1971, jun.), “The beginnings of le Corbusier education, 1902-07”, in: The Art Bulletin, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 214-224.

Zaknic, Ivan. (1990, Summer), “Le Corbusier’s Epiphany on Mount Athos”, in: Journal of Architecture Education, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 27-36.

Wisdom And Philosophy

Le Corbusier, play, Bataille Interpreting Ronchamp chapel according to the concept of formless in Bataille philosophy

References

References

Volume 16, Issue 64
January 2021
Pages 165-188

Le Corbusier, play, Bataille Interpreting Ronchamp chapel according to the concept of formless in Bataille philosophy

References

References

Volume 16, Issue 64January 2021Pages 165-188

Volume 16, Issue 64
January 2021
Pages 165-188