Plantinga, Wolterstorff and Westphal are three eminent Christian Philosophers in the United States today. This paper will examine Plantinga, Wolterstorff, and Westphal's response to Kant's anti-realist epistemology. While perhaps many Christian philosophers doing philosophy of religion in the United States follow the common-sense realism of Thomas Reid, some philosophers, like Merold Westphal, support a Christian-Kantian-Creative-Anti-Realism. I will criticize Plantinga's and Wolterstorff's position, and support Westphal's, arguing that Kant's epistemology does not harm religious belief but in fact supports it
Gustafson, A. (2005). Kant: Friend or Foe of the Believer? Plantinga and Other American Christian Responses to Kant's Epistemology. Wisdom And Philosophy, 1(2), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2005.6910
MLA
Gustafson, A. "Kant: Friend or Foe of the Believer? Plantinga and Other American Christian Responses to Kant's Epistemology", Wisdom And Philosophy, 1, 2, 2005, 49–65. doi: 10.22054/wph.2005.6910
HARVARD
Gustafson, A. (2005). 'Kant: Friend or Foe of the Believer? Plantinga and Other American Christian Responses to Kant's Epistemology', Wisdom And Philosophy, 1(2), pp. 49–65. doi: 10.22054/wph.2005.6910
CHICAGO
Gustafson, A., "Kant: Friend or Foe of the Believer? Plantinga and Other American Christian Responses to Kant's Epistemology." Wisdom And Philosophy, 1 2 (2005): 49–65, doi: 10.22054/wph.2005.6910
VANCOUVER
Gustafson A. Kant: Friend or Foe of the Believer? Plantinga and Other American Christian Responses to Kant's Epistemology. Wisdom And Philosophy. 2005;1(2):49–65 (In Persian). doi: 10.22054/wph.2005.6910
