Analysis of the Philosophical Foundations of William James' Criticism of Reductionism in Religious Studies: The Transition from Medical Materialism to Neurotheology

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Associate professor of Semnan university, Department of Theology(Religions and Mysticism)

Abstract
In this article, with the aim of filling in the gaps between the lines, an attempt is made to explain the transition from extreme reductionism to a non-reductionist explanatory approach. James's method is usually considered pragmatism, but the background of his pragmatic approach must be reread in light of the conceptual network of pure experience, neutral monism, and radical empiricism. The distinction between existential and value judgments has its roots in the concept of pure experience, which James considers the metaphysical foundation of radical empiricism. Unlike classical empiricism, he has a comprehensive view of different levels of human experience, including religious experience, and this approach has paved the way for subsequent researchers to consider the epistemological position and psychological function of religious experience. James's phenomenological approach to religious experience can be considered the beginning of the reductionist critique of religious studies. What Newberg says about the principle of neutral causal orientation and the interaction of neuroscience and phenomenology to determine the correlation between religious experience and the neurological mechanisms of the brain has its roots in James's criticisms of medical materialism. Newberg's emphasis on the point that instead of explaining causality, the concept of correlation should be used to explain the relationship between the phenomenological components of religious experience and brain mechanisms is one of the results of James's non-reductionist approach in the literature on the psychology of religion

Keywords

Subjects

Feuerbach, L. (1893). Essence of Christianity (M. Evans, Trans.). New York: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co.
Freud, S. (1950). Totem and taboo: Some points of agreement between the mental lives of savages and neurotics (J. Strachey, Trans.). London: Routledge.
Hume, D. (2007). Dialogues concerning natural religion and other writings (D. Coleman, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
James, W. (1897). The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy. New York and London: Longmans Green and Co.
James, W. (1904a). A world of pure experience. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 1(20), 533-543. https://doi.org/10.2307/2011912
James, W. (1904b). Does "consciousness" exist? The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 1(18), 477-491. https://doi.org/10.2307/2011942
James, W. (1911). Some problems of philosophy: Beginning of an introduction to philosophy. New York & London: Longmans Green and Co.
James, W. (1922). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York & London:Longman Green and Co.
Lamberth, D. C. (1999). William James and the metaphysics of experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moon, J. S., Kuza, C. M., & Desa, M. S. (2017). William James, nitrous oxide, and the anaesthetic revelation. Journal of Anesthesia History, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janh.2017.10.012
Papineau, D. (2001). The rise of physicalism. In G. Gillett & B. Loewer (Eds.), Physicalism and its discontents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Proudfoot, W. (1985). Religious experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Seigfried, C. H. (1989). William James's phenomenological methodology. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 20(1), 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1989.11006819
Smart, J. J. C. (1959). Sensations and brain processes. Philosophical Review, 68(2), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182164
 
References [In Persian & In Arabic]
Charlesworth, M. (2017). Philosophy and religion: From Plato to postmodernism (A. Sanaee, Trans.).Semnan: Semnan University Press. [In Persian]
James, W. (2014). Varieties of religious experience (H. Kiani, Trans.).Tehran: Hekmat. [In Persian]
Newberg, A. (2020). Principles of neurotheology (A. Sanaee, Trans.). Semnan: Semnan University Press. [In Persian]
Wulff, D. M. (2007). Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary (M. Dehghani, Trans.). Tehran: Roshd. [In Persian]