Document Type : Research Paper

Author

URD - Qom

Abstract

The present article, in its analytical-comparative method, examines the problem of evil from the perspective of Kant's moral teleology and the faithful theology of Marilyn McCord Adams. In Kant's view, evil has no special status in nature, but it is merely one of the possible capacities of Nature, in the position of actualizing its powers. The human solution to prevent evil is an opportunity to emerge his intellectual and moral powers. It composes an absolute moral order that, contrary to his natural inclinations, transforms humans kinds into rational and creative beings and organizes human relationships. Kant's God is an idea that is assumed and sanctified as a supreme good over the world, following the call of moral conscience. However, nature in its moral and ultimate reading in Kant's third critique moves in the direction of human well-being. It can be considered an institution and foundation far from evil. On the other hand, M.M. Adams as a Christian thinker who has lived in the modern world, has attempted to 
take a different reading of the problem of evil. He interpreted it as a condition of man's likeness to God through the experience of divine suffering. An interpretation of evil and morality that is immoral in terms of basis and consequence, according to Kant'sreading of the nature of evil and morality

Keywords

Main Subjects

Adams, Marilyn McCord. (1999 a), Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Adams, Marilyn McCord, and Adams, Robert Merrihew. eds. (1990) The Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Adams, Marilyn McCord. (2006) Christ and Horrors: The Coherence of Christology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.-------------------------------. (1999 b) What Sort of Human Nature? Medieval Philosophy and the Systematics of Christology. Milwaukee: Marquette 
University Press.Dicenso, James, (2011), Kant, Religion and Politics, Cambridge University Press.Rossi, Philip J. and Wreen Michael, (1991), Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered, Indiana University Press.References [in Persian]Kant, Immanuel. (2015 A) Our foundation after nature of ethics, translated by Hamid Enayat and Ali Qeisari, Tehran, Kharazmi, second edition. [in Persian]-----------. (2015b) Religion in the Limits of Alone Reason, translated by Manouchehr Saneyi Dareh-Bidi, Tehran, Naqsh and Negar, 4th edition. [in Persian]------------. (2016A) Philosophy of Law, translated by Manouchehr Saneyi Dareh-Bidi, Tehran, Naqsh and Negar, 4th edition. [in Persian]
-----------. (2016b) Criticism of Practical Reason, translated by Insha Allah Rahmati, Tehran, Sofia, 5th edition. [in Persian]-----------. (2018) Criticism of the power of judgment, translated by Abdul Karim Rashidian, Tehran, Ney. [in Persian]Lynn, Tony. (2016) History of Christian Thought, translated by Robert Asrian, Tehran, Farzan Rooz. [in Persian]New Testament. (2018) translated by Pirouz Sayyar, Tehran, Ney. [in 
Persian]Pour Mohammadi, Naimeh. (2018) About evil: translation of selected 
articles in the philosophy and theology of evil, vol.1, Qom, Taha book. [in Persian]