Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate of Philosophy, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Philosophy, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Tabatabai and Motahari consider Sadra's philosophy to be a realistic philosophy and claim a kind of realism in the book "Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism". Ilham Dilman also believes that Wittgenstein's rejection of realism does not make him an idealist. Rather, Wittgenstein is also considered a realist in a sense. This article examines and compares the realism proposed in "Principles..." on the one hand and the realism that Dillman attributes to Wittgenstein on the other hand.

Keywords

Esma’ili, M. (2010) Philosophical Secondary Intelligent in Islamic Philosophy. Qom: Imam Khomeini Ins.
Dilman, I. (1973) Induction and Deduction. Bristol: Basil Blackwell
——— (1978) “Universals: Bambrough on Wittgenstein”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series 79: 35-58
——— (1998). Language and Reality. Leuven: Peeters.
——— (2002). Wittgenstein’s Copernican Revolution. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Motahari, Morteza. (1989). Collection of works volume 5. Qom: Sadra Publications. [in Persian]
---. (1989). Collection of works volume 6. Qom: Sadra Publications. [in Persian]
---. (1989). Collection of works volume 10. Qom: Sadra Publications. [in Persian]
Tabatabai, Mohammad Hossein. (2015). The end of wisdom (volume 3). Shirvani, Ali. Qom: Boustan Ketab. [in Persian]