Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 .PhD student in Political Science, University of Isfahan Department of Political Sciences. Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics. University of Isfahan Isfahan. Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Isfahan. Department of Political Sciences. Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics. University of Isfahan. Isfahan. Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Isfahan . Department of Political Sciences. Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics. University of Isfahan. Isfahan. Iran

Abstract

                                    
The analysis of authoritarianism in political systems, using theories presented in the field of philosophy of language, has been the main basis of this article. The main question of this article was: which components in poststructuralism can be used to start the process of passing 
authoritarianism and what will this transition look like from a poststructuralist point of view? In order to reach the answer, first by using the descriptive method of poststructuralism, of course, based on the views of Wittgenstein and Derrida, explanations are provided and an attempt has been made to determine the components inside it. After that, an attempt has been made to analyze authoritarianism in politicalsystems by using the components of poststructuralism. After that, the transition from authoritarianism has been considered and an attempt has 
been made to provide explanations about how to transition from a poststructuralist point of view. In the end, there are explanations about the type of government that is closer to the characteristics of poststructuralism. The main result of this article is that there are features 
of poststructuralism that paying attention to them in the field of politics can be a way to overcome authoritarianism. The social nature of language, changeability, evolvability, decentralization, endless differences, and lack of semantic fixation are some of the 
characteristics.

Keywords


Bagiu, L (2009). Writing in Deconstruction vs Speech in Structuralism (Jacques Derrida VsFerdinand de Saussure). Transilvania, Vol8, 79-87.Derrida, J (2006). Specters of Marx, The State of the Debt, The Work of Mourning and the new International. Trans by Peggy Kamuf, New 
York and London: Routledge Derrida, J (2005a). Rogues, Two Essay on Reason. Trans by Anne Brault and Michael Naas. California: Stanford University Press.Derrida, J (2005b). The Politics of Friendship. Trans by George Collins, London: Verso.Derrida, J (2003). Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Chicago and London: university of Chicago press.Deodato, J (2010). Deconstructing the library with Jacques Derrida. University of New Jersey, Vol7, 75-87.Ghosh, S (2016). Ferdinand de Saussure and Development of Structuralism. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 1(1), 59-64.Jacquette, D (2015). Later Wittgenstein on the Invention of Games. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, Vol 14, 19-38.Roseman, P, W (2013). Poststructuralism. Ethics and Philosophy, Vol3Williams, j (2005). Understanding Poststructuralism. London: Acumen
References [in Persian]Agha Hosseini, Alireza and Ali Hosseini, Ali et al. (2016). Jacques Derrida, 
Deconstruction and Democracy. Political Science Quarterly. Year 13, number 1. 151-170. [in Persian]Alam, Abdul Rahman and Mustafa Ensafi (2017). Recognizing the transition from structuralism to post-structuralism. Politics Quarterly. Period 48. number 1. 59-76. [in Persian]
Alam, Abdul Rahman (2010). Foundations of political science. Tehran: Ney. [in Persian]
Barrett, Rolan (2004). The Empire of Signs. Translated by Nasser Fakuhi,Tehran: Ney. [in Persian]
Chomsky, Noam (2012). Cartesian Linguistics. Translation by Ahmad Taherian, Tehran: Hermes. [in Persian]Chapman, Shivan (2005). From Philosophy to Linguistics. Translated by 
Hossein Safi, Tehran: Gam-e No. [in Persian]Derrida, Jacques (2016). Of Grammatology. Translated by Mehdi Parsa, Tehran: Shund. [in Persian]Derrida, Jacques (2002). Positions. Translation of Payam Yazdanjo, Tehran: Markaz. [in Persian]90 Derrida, Jacques and et al. (2005). The Aporia of Signs. Translated by Mani Haghighi, Tehran: Markaz. [in Persian]Foucault, Michel (2000). Iran: The Spirit of a World Without Spirit. Translated by Nikou Sarkhosh and Afshin Jahandideh, Tehran: Ney. [in 
Persian]Fathzadeh, Hassan (2016). Art without metaphysics: a post-structuralist 
reading of art. Two Quarterly Philosophical Reflections. Year 7. Number 19. 37-58. [in Persian]
McCain, Marie (2004). Wittgenstein and The Philosophical Investigations. Translation by Iraj Ghanouni, Tehran: Ney. [in Persian]Norris, Christopher (2006). Deconstruction. Translation of Payam Yazdanjo, Tehran: Markaz. [in Persian]Rush, Michael (1390). Society and politics. Translated by Manouchehr Sabouri, Tehran: Samt. [in Persian]Royle, Nicholas (2015). Jacques Derrida. Pouya Imani translation, Tehran: Markaz. [in Persian]Saussure, Ferdinand (2015). Course in General Linguistics. Translation by Kourosh Safavi, Tehran: Hermes. [in Persian]Shaghool, Yousef and Mortazavi Rahman (2009). Derrida and Democracy. Contemporary Political Essays Quarterly. Year 1, Number 2. 47-63. [in Persian]Safavi, Kourosh (2010). From Linguistics to Literature. Tehran: Sureh-ye Mehr. [in Persian]Tajik, Mohammad Reza (2006). Poststructuralism and Methodology. 
Humanities Methodology Quarterly. Year 13. Number 50. 44-70. [in Persian]Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2005). Zettell. Translation by Malek Hosseini, Tehran: Hermes. [in Persian]Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2001). Philosophical Investigations. Translated by Fereydoun Fatemi, Tehran: Markaz. [in Persian]
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2000). On Certainty. Translation by Malek Hosseini, Tehran: Hermes. [in Persian]Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2006). Blue and brown books. Translation by Iraj 
Ghanouni, Tehran: Ney. [in Persian]