Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran;

Abstract

The present article studies Rorty’s pragmatic attitude to the mind-body problem. This project expresses itself along two axes: his critical attitude to the Cartesian conception of the mind as mirror of nature, and his pragmatic idea of the man named non-reductive physicalism. Based on historicism, he shows that there is an epistemic gap between philosophical paradigms, and each of them and the problems arising from them depend on the historical conditions and are optional. In addition, he makes it clear that the problem of mind is the result of presupposing the assumptions of historical origin, which have been chosen for non-epistemic causes in the same particular historic period. Therefore, the traditional conception of knowledge and mind may be replaced by a pragmatic conception of knowledge, which is a matter of conversation, of social practice, and a pragmatic idea of the man, that is, materialism without mind and body identity.

Keywords

Descartes, Rene. (1988). Descartes Selected Philosophical Writings, trans. by John Cottingham and Robert Stoothoff and Dugald Murdoch, Cambridge University Press.
Lacey, A.R. (1996)."Mind and Body: Non-reductionist Theories", in an Encyclopaedia of Philosoophy, ed. by G. H. R. Parkinson, Routledge, First Published 1988.
Langiulli, Nino. (2002). "Review of Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature", in Richard Rorty, ed. by Alan Malachowski, SAGE publications.
Madell, Geoffrey. (1996). "Behaviourism”, in an Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, ed. by G. H. R. Parkinson, Routledge, First Published 1988.
Rorty, Richard. (1980). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Basil Blackwell, First Published, 1979.
Rorty, Richard. (1991). Consequences of Pragmatism, University of Minnesota Press, First Published 1982.
Rorty, Richard. (1996). Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers Volume 1, Cambridge University Press, First Published 1991.