Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 phD in Philosophy, Tabriz University, Iran

2 Department of philosophy 3 Allameh Research Institute , University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Undoubtedly, the problem of human beings and the recognition of his nature are considered to be the main concerns of Kant. This concern, before he began to write his critical philosophy, led him to research subjects related to human nature, and eventually led him to consider humanity as an answer to the main philosophical question. Kant distinguishes between two types of research on the nature of mankind: the pragmatic research that speaks of it in his ‘anthropology from a pragmatic point of view’, and transcendental research that is called ‘transcendental anthropology’, a term that he did not explain in any of his works. But what does Kant mean by this term and what does this concept mean about humans? In this article we are trying to examine two aspects of the term, the anthropological and transcendental, to clarify Kant’s mind and verify his definition of the human being. This study shows that Kant tries to examine the mental faculties of human beings to understand a priori what can be achieved about him. This study shows that, first, man is nothing but the origin of the laws of nature and can understand the fundamental laws of nature. Secondly, what to do is the moral law imposed upon him by his wit. And finally, what would have hoped is nothing more than that he realizes his ends through moral law and changes the natural world into the moral world.

Keywords

Alison, H. (2004). Kant’s transcendental Idealism,New Heaven: Yale University Press
Frierson, P. (2013). Kant’s questions: what is Human Being?, New York: Routledge.
Guyer, P. (2006). Kant, New York: Routledge
Hegel, G. (1991). Elements of the philosophy of Rights, Ed, Wood A., New York: Cambridge UP.
Kant, I. (1976). Critique of practical reason, Trans. Beck, L., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
………. .(1991). The Metaphysics of Morals, Trans. Gregor M., Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
………. .(1997). Lectures on Ethics, Translated by Heath, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
……… .(1998). Religion within the limits of Reason Alone, Trans. Wood A. and Giovanni, G., Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
…….. .(2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment, Trans. Guyer P. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
……… .(2002a). Metaphysical foundations of natural science, in The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Kant, Trans. Friedman, M., Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
……... .(2002b). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Trans. Wood w. New Heaven: Yale University Press
Kant, Immanuel, (2005). Critique of Practical Reason, translated by Ensha’allah Rahmati, Tehran: Noor al-Saghalain Publications. [In Persian]
………............... (1998). Critique of Judgment, translated by Abdul Karim Rashidian, Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian]
Korsgaard, Ch. (1996). Creating the kingdom of Ends. New York: Cambridge university press.
Van de Pitte . Frederpick.p (1971). Kant as Philosophical Anthropologist, , Netherlands: The Hague
Wilson, H .(2006). Kant’s pragmatic Anthropology. Albany: state university of New York press.