Document Type : Research Paper

Author

professor of University of Mazandaran

Abstract

Popper and Derrida are two influential philosophers of different schools of thought in the second half of the twentieth century. In terms of epistemology, Popper belongs to the critical rationalism school and Derrida to the deconstruction approach. Both of them intend to question any philosophical, social, political, and linguistic fundamentalism. They aspire to go beyond the duality of realism and idealism, and to this end, each offers his own definition of reason’s essence/substance and its domain. Popper distinguishes between the affirmative and negative aspects of reason. He counts the affirmative aspect of reason as fundamentalism that must be abandoned and the negative aspect of reason as the faculty necessary to explain any scientific Philosophy. On the other hand, Derrida questions the totality of reason from a critical perspective toward logo-centrism in the Western metaphysics of presence. The article goes on to compare Popper's and Derrida’s approach in the Philosophy of science and explains the essence /substance of Philosophy of deconstructive science.

Keywords

پوپر، کارل. (1374). شناخت عینی، برداشتی تکاملی. ترجمۀ احمد آرام. تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
-پوپر، کارل.  (1389). استعاره چارچوب: در دفاع از علم و عقلانیت. ترجمۀ علی پایا. تهران: انتشارات طرح نو.
-پوپر، کارل.  (1390). سرچشمه­های دانایی و نادانی. ترجمۀ عباس باقری. تهران: نشر نی.
-پوپر، کارل.  (1391). زندگی سراسر حل مساله است. ترجمۀ شهریار خواجیان. تهران: نشر مرکز.
-پوپر، کارل. (1392) .حدس ها و ابطال ها.ترجمۀرحمت الله جباری. تهران : شرکت سهامی انتشار.  
- خبازی کناری، مهدی. (1395).  ازdifference   تا  Differance ، سیر تکوین ساختارزدایانه ی مفاهیم دریدا. تهران : انتشارات حکایت قلم نوین.
 -شی یرمو، جرمی. (1378). اندیشه سیاسی کارل پوپر. ترجمۀ عزت الله فولادوند. تهران: طرح نو.
Derrida, Jacques. (1981). Dissemination. trans. Barbara Johnson, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
 Derrida, J. (1983). "The principle of reason: The university in the eyes of its pupils". Diacritics. 13 (3), (2-20).
Derrida, Jacques. (1988). Letter To A Japanese Friend. In Derrida and Differance. Eds. by David wood and Robert Bernasconi. England:  Northwestern university press. (p.p 1-5).
 Derrida, Jacques. (1989). Memoirs for Paul de man. Trans. Cecile Lindsay.   Jonathan culler, Edurado cadava, and peggy kamuf. New York:  Columbia university press.   
Derrida, Jacques. (1997). Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty   Spivak. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.           
 Derrida, Jacques. (2002). Writing and Difference. Trans. Alan Bass. London: Routledge.
Hacohen, Malachi Haim. (2000). M. Karl Popper: The Formative Years, 1902–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lane, Jan. Erik. (2009). Epistemplogy for a Global Open Society: Popper and Derrida Endorsing a Critical Society in Globalization- the Juggernaut of The 21st Century. England. Hampshire: Ashgat Publicating Limited (187- 202)
Parusnikova, Zuzana. (1992). “Is a Postmodern Philosophy of Science Possible?” In: Stud. Hist and Biomed. Sci. Vol. 23. No1. (21- 37)
Parusnikova, Zuzana. (2002). “Integrative Medicine: Partnership or Control?” In Stud. Hist and Biomed. Sci. 3(169- 186).
Parusnikova, Zuzana. (2009). Ratio Negativa, The Popperian Challenge”. In Rethinking Popper. Edited: Zuzana Parusnikova. Roberts. Cohen.U.S.A: Springer
 Plotnitsky, Arkady. (1994).Complementarity. Anti- epistemology after Bohr and Derrida. Durham and London: Duke University Press
Popper, Karl Raimund. (1980). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Tenth impression, London: Unwin Hyman     
 Trifonas, Peter Pericles. (2012). “Deconstructing science”. Cult Stud of Sci Educ. 7 (1027–1036)
Watkins, John W. N. (1974). "The Unity of Popper's Thought". The Philosophy of Karl Popper. vol. I. La Salle, Illinois  (Open Court), ( 371–412).