Ahmad Sharafshahi; Ali Akbar Ahmadi Aframjani
Abstract
Wittgenstein in his later Philosophy, as in his early Philosophy, reiterates that philosophical method or activity is a critical activity although he develops it method in his later Philosophy. In some fragments of Philosophical Investigations, he calls this method therapeutic, in which, the philosopher ...
Read More
Wittgenstein in his later Philosophy, as in his early Philosophy, reiterates that philosophical method or activity is a critical activity although he develops it method in his later Philosophy. In some fragments of Philosophical Investigations, he calls this method therapeutic, in which, the philosopher recognizes the cause of fallacy or categorical mistake. Establishing such a method has been possible through a new vision of language, which does not see language as apart from linguistic activities. In other words, concepts have internal relation with our linguistic activities and our life-with-concepts, and their meanings are not graspable separate from their context. Indeed, by concentration on "use" in language, Wittgenstein wants to show the interrelation of language and our form of life. In Wittgenstein’s view, philosophical problems arise of neglecting this insight about language because philosophers see language separate and abstracted from any activity. By considering Wittgenstein’s revolutionary approach to language, philosophical problems arise from ignoring and confusing the uses of language, which will be dissolved with showing the confusion.
Gholam abbas Jamali
Abstract
For Husserl, ontological frame of ideal sense is an indispensable foundation which describes phenomenon as objects of experience, being significance of language as well as objectivity of these constitution. Opposing, for Wittgenstein, meaning is noting expect logical form of sentence that is analyzed ...
Read More
For Husserl, ontological frame of ideal sense is an indispensable foundation which describes phenomenon as objects of experience, being significance of language as well as objectivity of these constitution. Opposing, for Wittgenstein, meaning is noting expect logical form of sentence that is analyzed through relation between structure of sentence and its picture and the relation between the both with state of affairs. Therefore thought and thinking are provided in terms of language as we illustrate by this paper. Husserl’s concept of ideal sense is settled into “Feregean” interpretation of Husserl’s theory by “California” phenomenology. This interpretation is failed through effective writings of analytic philosophers, especially Wittgenstein, as we illustrate it comprehensively. These written works specify that internal menology is incommunicable, thereby they make invalidity Husserl’s concept of the sense and the objectivity of acts of sense. The current study ties Wittgenstein’s theory of expectation with his concepts of role-following and per- determinate instructions, as a new theory. Also, the study analyzes how bearer propositions of expectation are constituted based on per- determinate instructions in relation to indicative propositions, as another new.
mohammad ra'yat jahromi
Abstract
Wittgenstein and Gadamer, in some sense, are the last links of the two philosophical effective schools, namely the Analytical and the Continental philosophy; two traditions which seems somehow divergent. This paper rejects this divergence and intends to open the door of intercommunity of them by the ...
Read More
Wittgenstein and Gadamer, in some sense, are the last links of the two philosophical effective schools, namely the Analytical and the Continental philosophy; two traditions which seems somehow divergent. This paper rejects this divergence and intends to open the door of intercommunity of them by the way of the language and its playfulness. Understanding is a common concern of Wittgenstein and Gadamer of which language based manner and playfulness are two main characteristics. Furthermore, there is a kind of simultaneity between playfulness and culture, tradition, prejudices and history about which we discuss in this paper. Besides, this paper intends to explicate the contrast between playfulness and gamefulness in Gadamer and Wittgenstein‘s thought.
