Hossein Salimi; Leila Ahar
Abstract
Analyzing the phenomena of the social world based on the idea is the purpose of this article. The paper attempts to show that ideas as the explanatory factor can be used in the study of social and political issues. To explain the analytic role of the idea, we take a constructivist-interpretive overview ...
Read More
Analyzing the phenomena of the social world based on the idea is the purpose of this article. The paper attempts to show that ideas as the explanatory factor can be used in the study of social and political issues. To explain the analytic role of the idea, we take a constructivist-interpretive overview of the question "How is it possible?". Accordingly, the thinking human is at the center of attention. According to the constructivist-interpretive approach, it is the qualities in the thinking human that enable him to construct an idea of meaning and then give effect to it. These features include: 1) the human mental structure, (2) the ideographic perception of human, (3) the representational role of concepts and language in human, (4) causality in human, (5) rationality in human action. This article explains how human beings can influence the phenomena of the social world by explaining these characteristics in humans. By Understanding how the idea is influenced we show that the idea has the potential to be used as an explanatory factor for the analysis of social phenomena, including politics.
nooshafarin shahsavan; mohammad javad safian; gholamali hatam
Abstract
The relation between Art and Truth in the history of western thought has been proposed since the advent of art theory in the Plato and Aristotle era. In the modern era, philosophers have also considered this relation. We know that there was a great deal of separation by Baumgarten, between Truth and ...
Read More
The relation between Art and Truth in the history of western thought has been proposed since the advent of art theory in the Plato and Aristotle era. In the modern era, philosophers have also considered this relation. We know that there was a great deal of separation by Baumgarten, between Truth and Art with the advent of aesthetics in the modern era, and this separation got determined by Kant. But after him, thinkers such as Hegel tried to think about the relation of art and truth again. Of course, Hegel did not explicitly bring up the relationship between Art and Truth, but he considers Art as an appearance of "manifestations of the absolute" and dignity of its realization. Art is the first demonstration of absolute spirit. "What is the relationship between Art and Truth from Hegel's point of view? What is his perception and comprehension of the Truth? And how does he attempt to overcome the complete separation between Art and Truth (with his dialectics, of course) which has been brought by modern aesthetics?", are the main questions of this paper. The method of this research is the interpretative and content analysis based on the works of Hegel, his commentators, and other philosophers (related to the subject).
elham kandari; saeed binai motlagh
Abstract
One of the most basic metaphysical doctrines is the "Oneness". We are, in this paper, coming to introduce this doctrine in Aristotle; and, so, at first, we mention basic differences between him and his formers, and distinguish Aristotle's "multiple" view from their "monistic" view. Then, counting the ...
Read More
One of the most basic metaphysical doctrines is the "Oneness". We are, in this paper, coming to introduce this doctrine in Aristotle; and, so, at first, we mention basic differences between him and his formers, and distinguish Aristotle's "multiple" view from their "monistic" view. Then, counting the meanings of "one" in common Greek language, we receive to two kinds of oneness: material and formal. We will see that perfection, oneness, and form are parallel to potentiality, multiplicity, and matter; and oneness, in its foremost sense, is the formal "one", not material; and this formal "one" is the principle of individuality. Finally, we will see that how immovable movers, and most of all the first immovable mover, are abstract individuals and the first "Ones".
kazem Hani; Reza Soleyman heshmat
Abstract
The prevalent conception about Plato’s philosophy is that, by differentiating sensible things from the realm of Ideas, he has made a step toward establishing Metaphysics. From Plato’s viewpoint, ideas form the essences of sensible things. Ideas are the condition of both the existence of sensible ...
Read More
The prevalent conception about Plato’s philosophy is that, by differentiating sensible things from the realm of Ideas, he has made a step toward establishing Metaphysics. From Plato’s viewpoint, ideas form the essences of sensible things. Ideas are the condition of both the existence of sensible things and their recognition. Now, considering this original ontology and epistemology, some important issues arise: how do sensible things relate to Ideas? To what extent is Aristotle’s viewpoint regarding the separation of Ideas and sensible things acceptable? What effect does the existence of Ideas have on our conception regarding human beings (Dasein) and her/his practical life? In this paper, we attempt to consider these questions from the viewpoint of two German philosophers, namely Martin Heidegger and Hans Georg Gadamer. While Heidegger believes that Plato by proposing the doctrine of ideas began oblivion of truth in the meaning of unhiddenness and disconcealment and also resulted in the oblivion of Being, Gadamer believes that Heidegger’s interpretation of Plato and the whole history of Metaphysics was under the influence of Aristotle’s criticism. On the one hand, consulting to dialogues of Plato, Gadamer clearly explains the relation of ideas and sensible things but on the other hand, he emphasizes that the Good while being transcendence and concealment is present in all of our actions.
