Roohollah Fadaei; Mohammad Saeedimehr
Abstract
Galen is one of the most prominent thinkers and scientists in antiquity, who paid special attention to the methodology of natural sciences. On the other hand, the transition of Galenic tradition to the Islamic world had a wide impact on different areas of thought, one of which was methodology. Accordingly, ...
Read More
Galen is one of the most prominent thinkers and scientists in antiquity, who paid special attention to the methodology of natural sciences. On the other hand, the transition of Galenic tradition to the Islamic world had a wide impact on different areas of thought, one of which was methodology. Accordingly, studying Galen's scientific methodology plays a significant role in a true understanding of the scientific tradition in the Islamic medieval ages. This article, using the method of text-oriented analytic interpretation, expounds on the status of reason as one of the two main elements of Galen's methodology. In his view, the reason is the main part of the human soul which provides the scientific method both formally and materially. Its formal functions, pertaining to the logical scope, are as follows: demonstration, division and synthesis, definition, similarity and dissimilarity, analysis and synthesis, and indication. On the other hand, in a material sense, the mind provides the necessary prerequisites for the formation of proof and implication by understanding rational axioms.
Alireza Nazari; Fazel Asadi Amjad
Abstract
Eugène Ionesco in his play, The killer (1960) depicts a true reflection of the human condition; he depicts the images of life and death, being and non-being, and the reality of man’s reduction into the cypher of non-being. He wants man to come to grips with his true situation; hence, man's ...
Read More
Eugène Ionesco in his play, The killer (1960) depicts a true reflection of the human condition; he depicts the images of life and death, being and non-being, and the reality of man’s reduction into the cypher of non-being. He wants man to come to grips with his true situation; hence, man's existence is fundamentally a conflict between the infinite extensions of the human urge as opposed to the necessary and limited state of being. The aim of this paper is to examine Ionesco's ideas on the loneliness of man in this alienated universe, his hidden anxieties and his struggle for survival within an Existential framework of Søren Kierkegaard; examples are drawn from The killer (1960) in order to fully examine Ionesco’s particular vision of life. Such a study aims at bringing about a realization and understanding of the conditions man is exposed to in the universe. It is too hard for Bérenger to believe that nothingness precedes, envelops, and conditions all being. He faces the two coexistent side of living: in felicity and in the shadow of death.
mehdi behniafar; hamideh mokhtari
Abstract
The relationship between Reason and Religion is one of the most fundamental matters in the territory of Philosophy of Religion and philosophical epistemology. Theologians have considered especially religious aspects of it from many centuries ago and have presented different perspectives on this issue. ...
Read More
The relationship between Reason and Religion is one of the most fundamental matters in the territory of Philosophy of Religion and philosophical epistemology. Theologians have considered especially religious aspects of it from many centuries ago and have presented different perspectives on this issue. In this paper, we intend to survey Motahari’s view about the Islamic Pillars or Principles, and also analyze possibility of putting these principles as axioms of an axiomatic (and maybe a deductive) system. Then, in further step, we examine the hypothesis that Motahari’s viewpoint of the principles of religion make a Rational Entrance for ancillaries and secondary articles of Islam. Furthermore, we are going to Show this entry is a rational position for the principles of religion that have a philosophical value. In addition; this entry specifies the relationship between reason and religion. Meanwhile, we will represent that its extern–religious prospect in philosophy of religion is independent of intra–religious prospect. Finally, based on this premises, we can derive only one compatible response to the question of relation between Reason and Religion. The response will be a Rational and cross religious one that would be the inter-subjective and defensive basis for dialogue among Religions.
Mohammadreza Abdulahnezhad
Abstract
The concept of ‘free will’ is central in both Kant’s and Schopenhauer’s moral philosophy. In the Kantian moral system, ‘free will’ is only regarded as moral when it dutifully follows reason and its a priori, absolute rules. Schopenhauer, on the other hand, holds that ...
Read More
The concept of ‘free will’ is central in both Kant’s and Schopenhauer’s moral philosophy. In the Kantian moral system, ‘free will’ is only regarded as moral when it dutifully follows reason and its a priori, absolute rules. Schopenhauer, on the other hand, holds that since human will is a priori to his reason, reason cannot engage will into any action. Instead of reason, he regards human motivations and stimulations as the main sources which shape any action, including moral actions. The important point is that he identifies three types of stimulations, namely ‘compassion’, ‘egoism’ and ‘pessimism’, among which he finds only ‘compassion’ to be the true stimulation for moral action and the basis of moral acts, and he dismisses the other two as immoral stimulations. He criticises foundations of the Kantian moral philosophy with the help of three following arguments: first, he questions the Kantian moral formalism and his a priori claims; second, he criticises the conceptual flaw in Kant’s moral philosophy (which is the result of an inconsistency between his claim that morality should be based on reason and his inner appreciation of verbal morality); third, he accuses Kant’s moral system of being one based on egoism. The present paper aims to explain the main status and characteristic of Schopenhauer’s moral system by way of explaining his criticism of Kant’s moral system.
eynollah khademi; alireza arabi
Abstract
Bihar al-Anwar is the most important and comprehensive hadith collection compiled by the Shia scholar Allameh Majlesi, who represents the philosophical thought of transcendental hikmah or al-hikmah al-muta'aliyah at modern time. The annotations Allameh Tabataba'i made to this book are mainly criticisms ...
Read More
Bihar al-Anwar is the most important and comprehensive hadith collection compiled by the Shia scholar Allameh Majlesi, who represents the philosophical thought of transcendental hikmah or al-hikmah al-muta'aliyah at modern time. The annotations Allameh Tabataba'i made to this book are mainly criticisms of Allameh Majlesi's views and statements. A more comprehensive study of these annotations, thus, facilitates not only the revival of the annotation-writing and critical-thinking traditions but also the recognition of the differences and similarities of approaches and doctrines between these two great religious scholars. This research is an attempt to clarify, explain, analyze, criticize and study two of most controversial annotations Allameh Tabataba'i made to Bihar al-Anwar. It is worth emphasizing that the criticism of Allameh Majlesi's views made the present researchers devote a large part of the research to studying and clarifying them. Accordingly, they sought to study his definitions of reason according to the terms and idioms of three main schools of philosophy and recognize the reasons for his cynicism about the philosophers and their views. In addition, his approach to the study of religion and religious texts and his concerns about the metaphysical reasons are examined, and Allameh Tabataba'i's criticisms, claims and reasons are studied to demonstrate their veracity
davoud esparham
Abstract
Befor Inb Arabi, according to the Helenistic view, the human perception was confined to sensations and objects of reason. And, for the sensation was regarded as an instrument for reason, the latter was thought as the final perceptive faculty. Furthermore, the reason supported by logics, was regarded ...
Read More
Befor Inb Arabi, according to the Helenistic view, the human perception was confined to sensations and objects of reason. And, for the sensation was regarded as an instrument for reason, the latter was thought as the final perceptive faculty. Furthermore, the reason supported by logics, was regarded as the final judge. In the mentioned thought tradition, all of findings should be assessed in the light of reason to their truth of falsity be determined. Ibn Arabi suggests a new worldview and makes the traditional conception of reason encountered to some main challengs. According to this fact, orientalists rightly have called him the largest and most influential thinker in the second half of Islamic age. Ibn Arabi's meeting with Averoes – the main philosopher of his age – is regarded as a kind of end for a long time tradition and the begining of a new route. The route Ibn Arabi founded is takig authority from reason and giving it to the imagination in an strict sense. Nowaday, after the rise of postmodernism and many challenges about modern hypothses about the nature of human being and rationality, and refutation of many modern assumptions, inclination to reassessment of oriental thoughts has been increased, and therefore, there is an increasingly interest in Ibn Arabi's views. Thus, it is necessary to all of his ideas are studied in the light of current streams of thoughts. This paper tries to study and explicate Ibn Arabi's views about the imaginantion and its role and function in the realm of perception
reza mahuzi
Abstract
In the analysis of natural and artistic beauty, Kant explains the pleasure of the taste based on free play between Imagination and Understanding upon the principle of teleology of nature. Hence, the aesthetic judgments are produced by indeterminate harmony between Imagination and Understanding. Kant ...
Read More
In the analysis of natural and artistic beauty, Kant explains the pleasure of the taste based on free play between Imagination and Understanding upon the principle of teleology of nature. Hence, the aesthetic judgments are produced by indeterminate harmony between Imagination and Understanding. Kant explains the Sublime upon this principle, but he has not noticed the harmony between Imagination and Understanding in detail. Consequently, some of commentators have held that the Sublime is not important in Kant's philosophy of art. However, is it true that Kant has changed his opinion about aesthetic sensations? This paper aims at showing the fact that the Sublime is very important in Kant's aesthetical thoughts, because it explains the highest sensation of the Imagination and connects the Sublime to ethics and religion.
mehdi abbas zadeh
Abstract
This paper is an endeavor to conduct a comparative study of the viewpoints of Johannes Duns Scotus, Scottish philosopher and theologian (1266- 1308), on epistemology and knowledge, and Ibn Sina’s beliefs on the same issues. Given the fact that Scotus had studied the Latin translation of Ibn Sina's ...
Read More
This paper is an endeavor to conduct a comparative study of the viewpoints of Johannes Duns Scotus, Scottish philosopher and theologian (1266- 1308), on epistemology and knowledge, and Ibn Sina’s beliefs on the same issues. Given the fact that Scotus had studied the Latin translation of Ibn Sina's book, al-Shifa, the present study provides evidence as to how Scotus was influenced by Ibn Sina’s viewpoints under such issues as perceptional faculties, process of perception, natural object of reason, kinds of knowledge, levels of certainty, etc. While Scotus and Ibn Sina had been both influenced by Aristotle and the peripatetic tradition, there are still observed differences between them. Logical reasons, therefore, urge us to conduct a comparative study concerning the viewpoints of the two thinkers. With the above in mind, we will take into consideration the different atmospheres and cultures in which they lived; living and thus thinking in a Christian environment for one, and in an Islamic atmosphere for the other.
mohammad asghari
Abstract
This article considers the relation of reason and faith in Kierkegaard's existentialist Thought. Kierkegaard describes the faith as a kind of "passion", "leap" or "relation to God" and believes that it is over reason and sometimes has position that is completely against reason. According to Kierkegaard, ...
Read More
This article considers the relation of reason and faith in Kierkegaard's existentialist Thought. Kierkegaard describes the faith as a kind of "passion", "leap" or "relation to God" and believes that it is over reason and sometimes has position that is completely against reason. According to Kierkegaard, the faith can save us but we cannot know the faith by reason. He defend faith against reason, hence he is called a "Fideist." In addition, this article tries to show that it is found a sort of rationalism in Kierkegaard’s works, especially when he is articulating the nature of faith; but his rationalism is not similar to the rationalism of enlightenment.
ebrahim musavi
Abstract
For a long time, Plato's thought has been affected by the interpretations of Aristotelianism or Neo-Platonism. However, some remarks which have been recently made regard the core of Plato's own thought in his dialogues. This becomes critical when we find something totally different from our traditional ...
Read More
For a long time, Plato's thought has been affected by the interpretations of Aristotelianism or Neo-Platonism. However, some remarks which have been recently made regard the core of Plato's own thought in his dialogues. This becomes critical when we find something totally different from our traditional knowledge about Plato comparing it with, for example, what we see in Theaetetus where Plato, unlike Aristotle and Plotinus, maintains no role for perception in knowledge acquisition, and this is the issue which will be discussed in the present paper. Therefore, such an approach makes a main difference between the old (classic) and new (modern) interpretations of Plato's works and develops a central element in his epistemology, as will be indicated. In this article we emphasize on the negative aspect of Plato's epistemology, however, with doing so, the positive aspect will be demonstrated too.
Mohammad Shafii
Abstract
While Kant presupposes the existence of science and ethic, he studies their boundaries and limits as well. For doing this, he applies two terms and expressions, i.e., “reason” and “understanding”. In this paper, we take a look at the definitions of those two concepts in Kant’s ...
Read More
While Kant presupposes the existence of science and ethic, he studies their boundaries and limits as well. For doing this, he applies two terms and expressions, i.e., “reason” and “understanding”. In this paper, we take a look at the definitions of those two concepts in Kant’s terminology within the approach that discriminates their differences. At first, the placement of these two faculties in science territory will be studied and then by examining of Kant’s ethical point of view, it will be concluded that in this approach, the functionality of reason appears in act and ethic domains, and pure reason is practical in its essence.
amer gheyturi; hamid taheri; jafar mirzaee
Abstract
This article aims to bring the French philosopher Jacques Derrida into conversation with the Persian mystic poet Mowlavi. What might link the two thinkers is their critical approach toward philosophers' claim as to the authority of reason upon the truth. According to both, reason should acknowledge its ...
Read More
This article aims to bring the French philosopher Jacques Derrida into conversation with the Persian mystic poet Mowlavi. What might link the two thinkers is their critical approach toward philosophers' claim as to the authority of reason upon the truth. According to both, reason should acknowledge its limits. However, by so criticizing the material reason, Mowlavi opens the way to Love, the Heart, or revelation as an alternative to get to the truth-a tool that Derida, as a philosopher, does not seem to resort to. Hence, he remains a philosopher to the end. It is, nevertheless, in acknowledging the limitations of the philosophical approach that he kneels down before truth and faith, speaking to his God with swollen eyes full of tears.
