ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Roman Ingarden’s Ontology of Music and Literary Work of Art
Roman Ingarden (1893-1970) is considered as the founder of ontology of art. Having been influenced by Husserl phenomenological doctrines, Ingarden argues that work of art and aesthetic object are ontologically two different entities. The work of art is ontically similar to other real objects while the aesthetic object has an intentional nature which is constituted by intentional acts in the consciousness of the audience. Classical music ontology is twofold: on the one hand, the musical work is identical with the score and, on the other, it finds its concretization during the performance. The ontology of literary work of art is layered and manifests plurality of its structure. According to Ingarden, every work of art has spaces of indeterminacy which are fulfilled by the audiences through their aesthetic experiences. The audience completes these spaces through the concretization. Thus, the perception of the work of art necessitates the active participation of the audience in an intersubjective manner.
https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_7505_e5ed62baf9926d27f9868ab3ab437245.pdf
2016-12-21
7
22
10.22054/wph.2017.7505
Roman Ingarden
Ontology
Phenomenology
music
Literary Work of Art
Mohammad reza
Abolghassemi
mr.abolghassemi@ut.ac.ir
1
assistant professor of art sciences at university of tehran, tehran, iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
Gniazdowski, Andrzej. (2010). “Roman Ingarden”, Handbook of Phenomenological Aesthetics, eds. Hans Rainer Sepp, L. Embree, Dordrecht: Springer.
1
Ingarden, Roman. (1973a). The Literary Work of Art. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Literature, translated by George G. Grabowicz, Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
2
Ingarden, Roman. (1973b). The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art, translated by Ruth Ann Crowley and Kenneth R. Olson, Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
3
Ingarden, Roman. (1989). Ontology of the Work of Art. The Musical Work, The Picture, The Architectural Wrok, The Film, translated by Raymond Meyer with John T. Goldthwait, Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.
4
Iseminger, Gary. (1973). «Roman Ingarden and the Aesthetic Object», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 417-420.
5
Limido-Heulot, Patricia. (2013). Roman Ingarden, Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.
6
Mitscherling, Jeff. (1997). Roman Ingarden’s Ontology and Aesthetics, Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
7
Potocki, Christophe. (2013). «Introduction», Roman Ingarden : ontologie, esthétique, fiction, sld. J.-M. Schaeffer, Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines.
8
Pouivet, Roger. (2013). “Défendre l’ontologie de l’art avec Ingarden”, Roman Ingarden : ontologie, esthétique, fiction, sld. J.-M. Schaeffer, Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines.
9
Szczepanska, Anita. (1989). “The Structure of Artworks”, On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden Interpretations and Assessments, Kluwer, Bohdan Dziemidok, Peter McCormick (eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10
Tatarkiewicz, Władysław. (1971). “Roman Ingarden, 1893-1970”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 31, No. 3, (Mar., 1971), pp. 460-462.
11
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Studying the interactional metaphor of Max Black
By generalizing and developing Richards’s view and by counting limitations of both the substitution and comparison theories, Max Black explains his interaction theory of metaphor. Words in Blacks view, interact in a metaphorical expression to produce a meaning that is the result of this interaction. Black analyzes this interaction as an interaction between the framework and focus of metaphor in which framework, by providing a unique context to focus, imposes an extension of meaning to the focus word. The focus word acquires a new meaning from this interaction. This article is intended to provide a comprehensive and clear study of interaction theory.
https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_7506_89c2219f873f674fb56031b164a7da50.pdf
2016-12-21
23
44
10.22054/wph.2017.7506
Metaphor
Interactive View
Max Black
Morteza
Barati
mt.barati@yahoo.com
1
phD of Persian Language and Literature, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahwaz, Iran.
LEAD_AUTHOR
Mohammad Reza
salehi Mazandarani
2
Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahwaz, Iran.
AUTHOR
Nasrollah
Emami
nasrollaemami@yahoo.com
3
Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahwaz, Iran.
AUTHOR
Karim
Lowaimi Mutlaq
klmutlaq@scu.ac.ir
4
Assistant Professor of English Language and Literature, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahwaz, Iran.
AUTHOR
اژهای، محمد علی. (1376). «استعارۀ تعاملی»، مجلۀ جامعه شناسی کاربردی، شمارۀ 8، صفحات 1 تا 14.
1
استیور، دان. (1384).فلسفۀ زبان دینی. ترجمۀ ابوالفضل ساجدی، تهران: نشر ادیان.
2
حاج فرجالله دباغ، محمدحسین. (1393). مجاز در حقیقت؛ ورود استعارهها در علم، ،تهران: هرمس.
3
شیخ رضایی، حسین. (1388). «استعاره و علوم تجربی». فصلنامۀاندیشهدینیدانشگاهشیراز، شمارۀ 30، صفحات 74 -57.
4
ریچاردز، آی. ای.(1383). فلسفۀ بلاغت. ترجمۀ علیمحمد آسیابادی. تهران: قطره.
5
هاوکس. ترنس. (1393).استعاره. ترجمۀ فرزانه طاهری. تهران: مرکز.
6
Black, M. (1979)." How metaphors work: A reply to Donald Davidson". Critical Inquiry, 6(1), 131-143.
7
Black, M. (1954)." Metaphor". In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol: 55, pp. 273-294).
8
Black, M. (1977). "More about metaphor". Dialectica, 31, 431-457.
9
Black, Max. (1962). Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
10
Black, M. (1966). "Notes on the “Paradoxes of Confirmation". Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol: 43, pp 175-197.
11
Camp, Elisabeth and Marga Reimer.(2006) Metaphor. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Langauge. New York: Oxford University Press.
12
Davidson, D. (1978). "What metaphors mean". Critical inquiry, 5(1), pp 31-47.
13
Hills, David. (2004) The Pleasure of Ulteriority: Four Essays on Verbal Metaphor. Ph. D. diss. Princeton: Princeton University.
14
Johnson, Mark. (1981) ed. Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15
Kjärgaard, M. S. (1986). Metaphor and Parable. A Systematic Analysis of the Specific Structure and Cognitive Function of the Synoptic Similes and Parables qua Metaphors, Leiden: (AThD 20).
16
Lycan, W. G. (2000). Philosophy of language. London: Routledge.
17
Ricoeur. Paul. (1977). The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-disciplinary Studies of theCreation of Meaning in Language, trans. Robert Czerny with KathleenMcLaughlin and John Costello, SJ.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
18
Richards, I. A. (1937). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, renewed 1964; Galaxy 1965) 89.
19
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Citation Analysis of Journal of Wisdom and Philosophy in Allameh Tabataba'i University (1384-1393)
The present study investigates the citation behavior in published articles in the Journal of Philosophy and wisdom in the period 1384 to 1393. Firstly, in this analysis, we have a statistical analysis of the reference sections or bibliography of articles, the average number of citations, types of scientific items, the linguistic status of references, author self-citation, journal self-Citation and articles dedicated research areas. According to above statistical analysis conducted in this paper, at the conclusion of this study, we present and expose ten qualitative analysis in areas such as innovation, bibliometric analysis and research ethics is supplied. The authors reviewed here, as with many other areas of the humanities and even more of them, to write their works primarily rely on books, then articles and other scientific items. But, the result of our literature review derived from citation studies of philosophy and humanities in English articles, is different. Therefore, the special results and unique analysis and survey in research ethics is obtained. In addition, certain relation between the Iranian philosophical productions with categories such as "innovation", "team working" in the fields of humanities, as well as more theoretical knowledge than we have established a global production
https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_7507_883c646b5923d593a167f01f98acb4d2.pdf
2016-12-21
45
64
10.22054/wph.2017.7507
Citation Analysis
Philosophy
Self-Citation
Scientometrics
Research Ethics
Mahdi
behniafar
mahdibehnia@gmail.com
1
Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.
LEAD_AUTHOR
Amirhossein
Rajab Zadeh Assarha
amir.assarha@gmail.com
2
Master of Science and Information Science, University of Tehran, Iran.
AUTHOR
Zohreh.
Abbasian
zohrehabbasiyan@gmail.com
3
Master of Science in Library & Information Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
AUTHOR
احمدزاده، سعادت. (1386). « تحلیل استنادی مقالات هنری فارسی طی سالهای 1374 - 1384». مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات. 1(18). 109–124. بازیابی22 تیر 1395 از
1
http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/397576
2
اشتری، مهلقا. (1380). «تحلیل استنادی مقالات فلسفی فارسی طی سالهای 1370-1377». مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات. 2(12). 8–22. بازیابی 14 تیر 1395 از
3
http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/87450
4
پاکدامن، نشانه؛ علوی، فهیمه. (1389). «تحلیل استنادی مقالات فصلنامه تحقیق در علوم و مهندسی نفت (سالهای 80 - 86)». دانش شناسی. 1(2). 49–60. بازیابی 2 تیر 1395 از
5
http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/480883
6
تصویریقمصری، فاطمه؛ جهاننما، محمدرضا. (1385). «تحلیل استنادی پایاننامههای پژوهشگران پژوهشکده مهندسی جهاد کشاورزی». مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات. 1(17). 75–88. بازیابی 20 تیر 1395 ازhttp://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/159545
7
حری، عباس؛ نشاط، نرگس. (1381). «بررسی رفتار استنادی نویسندگان مقالههای مندرج در مجله روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تهران از آغاز تاکنون». روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی (دانشگاه تهران). 2(32). 1–34. بازیابی 25 تیر 1395 از
8
http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/90791
9
شهریاری، پرویز. (1385). «تحلیل استنادی مقالات فصلنامۀ علوم اطلاعرسانی (1381 - 1381)». مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات. 1(17). 89–102. بازیابی 25 تیر 1395 از
10
http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/159546
11
عصاره، فریده. (1377). «تحلیل استنادی». مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات. 3(9). 34–48. بازیابی 25 تیر 1395 از http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/87131
12
عصاره، فریده. (1380). «روشها و کاربردهای اطلاعسنجی». رهیافت. 25. 94–100. بازیابی 22 تیر 1395 از http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/407863
13
عصاره، فریده؛ فارسی، قربانعلی. (1381). «نمایه استنادی علوم (S. C. I) ساختار و کابردها». رهیافت. 27. 226–235. بازیابی 22 تیر 1395 از
14
http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/408290
15
عطاپور، هاشم؛ نوروزیچاکلی، عباس؛ حسنزاده، محمد. (1388). «بررسی و تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر ضریب تأثیر نشریات حوزه اقتصاد مورد تأیید وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری». سیاست علم و فناوری. 1(2)، 53–64. بازیابی 22 تیر 1395 از
16
http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/852441
17
علینژادچمازکتی، فاطمه. (1393). «تحلیل استنادی مقالات مجله (مطالعات ادبیات تطبیقی)». مطالعات ادبیات تطبیقی. 8. 129–143. بازیابی 23 تیر 1395 از
18
http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1063631
19
فصلنامه حکمت و فلسفه. (1392). گروهها-گروه آموزشی فلسفه-فصلنامۀ حکمت و فلسفه-معرفی و توضیحات دانشکدۀ الهیات و معارف اسلامی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی. دانشگاهی. بازیابی 22 تیر 1395، ازhttp://tisd.atu.ac.ir/fa/contents/afrad/falsafeh/faslname/moarrefi/html
20
فصلنامۀ حکمت و فلسفه. (بیتا). صفحه اصلی- اطلاعات نشریه. دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی. دانشگاهی. بازیابی 27 تیر 1395، از http://wph.atu.ac.ir/journal/indexing
21
کوشا، کیوان؛ طباطبایی، یوسف. (1388). «خوداستنادی و کاربرد آن در مطالعات علمسنجی». رهیافت. 44. 25–29. بازیابی 22 تیر 1395 از
22
http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/422510
23
کریمی، رضا؛ سلیمانی، راضیه. (1387). «تحلیل استنادی مقالات فصلنامۀ علوم حدیث». علوم حدیث. 1(13). 400–422. بازیابی 24 تیر 1395 از
24
http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/359717
25
متقیدادگر، امیر؛ کریمی، رضا؛ عبادالهعموقین، جعفر. (1388). «تحلیل استنادی مقالات 30 شماره از فصلنامه "پژوهشهای فلسفی کلامی" منتشره بین سالهای 1368 تا 1387». پژوهشهای فلسفی - کلامی. 1(11). 287–315. بازیابی 22 تیر 1395 از
26
http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/733157
27
مختارینبی، ابراهیم؛ مختاریمعمار، حسین. (1384). «تحلیل استنادی مقالات تألیفی مدیریت در نشریات مورد تأیید کمیسیون بررسی نشریات علمی کشور در سالهای 1375-1380». روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی (دانشگاه تهران). 2(35). 137–158. بازیابی 25 تیر 1395 از
28
http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/82440
29
همایی، بهروز؛ سلیمانی، راضیه؛ افشار، ابراهیم. (1390). «تحلیل استنادی مقالات». عیار پژوهش در علوم انسانی. 1(3). 175–194. بازیابی 22 تیر 1395 از
30
http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/960711
31
Buchanan, A. L, Herubel, J.P. V. M. (1993). "Comparing Materials Used in Philosophy and Political Science Dissertations". Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian. 12(2). 63–70.
32
Crawford, G. A. (2013). "A Citation Analysis of the Classical Philology Literature: Implications for Collection Development". Evidence Based Library And Information Practice. 8(2). 214–224. Retrieved July 14, 2016, from https: // ejournals. library. ualberta. ca/ index. php/ EBLIP/ article/ view/ 18598
33
Georgas, H.,& Cullars, J. (2005). "A Citation Study of the Characteristics of the Linguistics Literature". College & Research Libraries. 66(6). 496–516.
34
Knievel, J. (2013). »Alignment of Citation Behaviors of Philosophy Graduate Students and Faculty«. Evidence Based Library And Information Practice. 8(3). 19–33.
35
Knievel, J. E.,& Kellsey, C. (2005). "Citation Analysis for Collection Development: A Comparative Study of Eight Humanities Fields1". The Library Quarterly. 75(2). 142–168.
36
Kumar, K., Raghunadha Reddy,T. (2012). "CITATION ANALYSIS OF DISSERTATIONS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE، SRI VENKATESWARA UNIVERSITY, TIRUPATI". International Journal of Digital Library Services. 2(2). 44–84. Retrieved July 14, 2016, from http: // www. ijodls. in/ uploads/ 3/ 6/ 0/ 3/ 3603729/ full _paper _ vol-2_issue-22_.pdf.
37
Tiew, W.S., Kaur, K. (2000). "Citation Analysis of Journal of Natural Rubber Research,1988-1997". Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science. 5(2). 45–56. Retrieved July 16, 2016, from http://e-journal.um.edu.my/public/article-view.php?id=839.
38
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Mohammed Abed al-Jabri, reasons of Muslims’ decline and its solution
After several centuries of confrontation between Islam and the West, the question "What can be done to get rid of degeneration?” is the main concern for Muslim thinkers. Every thinker, by providing specific way, have on the head the concern of the revival of Muslim traditions, and thus a variety of solutions have emerged. One of these solutions belongs to Mohammed Abed al-Jabri, new rationalist thinker from Morocco. According to Abed al-Jabri, Muslim communities, due to the negligence of the tradition of Ibn Rushd and the lack of criticism in the past legacy, live in decadence and backwardness. Arabic wisdom (not necessarily Islamic intellect), has a particular structures that distinguishes it from Western sense. Relying on Islamic traditions and modern reading of the philosophy of Andalusia – especially Ibn Rushd- can answer the Muslim’s "What can be done to get rid of degeneration" question in the modern age. In his view, Ibn Rushd's thought, separated the religion and philosophy, and made the political and ideological tolerance desirable, saw criticism as a factor for prosperity, considered wisdom and religion having their own functions, and introduced wisdom as a tool for criticism. Thus, he believed it necessary to have a new reading of philosophy of Morocco and Andalusia to revive the intellectual traditions.
https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_7508_0db24cde60675624bc513a8e4ba135f9.pdf
2016-12-21
65
84
10.22054/wph.2017.7508
Islamic tradition
the decline of Muslims
Mohammed Abed al-Jabri
what should be done?
Amir
Roshan
amirroshan41@yahoo.com
1
Assistant Professor of Political Science Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
LEAD_AUTHOR
Farzad
Azarkamand
2
Master of Political Science Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
AUTHOR
قرآنکریم.
1
آرکون، محمد. (1386). خوابوخیالعربی. گفتوگو با محمدآرکون، ترجمۀ یاسر قزوینیحائری، خردنامۀ همشهری، تیرماه، شمارۀ 16، صص55-54.
2
آرکون، محمد. (1392). تاریخمندی اندیشۀ اسلامی. ترجمۀ رحیم حمداوی، چاپ اول، تهران: نگاه معاصر.
3
آرکون، محمدa. (1387). «محمد آرکون و میراث گفتمان جهان وطن» در نومعتزلیان؛ گفتوگوی انتقادی با نصرحامد ابوزید، محمدارکون، محمد عابدالجابری و حسن حنفی، مصاحبهکننده: محمدرضا وصفی، چاپاول، تهران: نگاهمعاصر.
4
آرکون، محمدb. (1387). «یافتن الگوییپویا و اجتهادی برای بازتعریف اندیشۀ دینی»، گفتوگوی انتقادی محدرضا وصفی با محمد آرکون، ماهنامۀ کتاب ماه دین، سال دوازدهم، شماره 15، (پیاپی 135).
5
دوستدار، آرامش. (1383). امتناع تفکر در فرهنگ دینی، چاپ اول، پاریس: خاوران.
6
السید،رضوان. (1383). اسلامسیاسی معاصر در کشاکش هویت وتجدد. ترجمۀ مجید مرادی، چاپ اول، تهران: باز.
7
عابدالجابری، محمد. (1384). عقل سیاسی در اسلام. ترجمۀ عبدالرضا سواری، چاپ اول، تهران: گام نو.
8
عابدالجابری، محمد. (1387a). ما و میراث فلسفیمان. ترجمۀ سید محمد آل مهدی، چاپ اول، تهران: ثالث.
9
عابدالجابری، محمد. (1387b). «عابدالجابری و عقلانیت نقادانه در تهافه بر فلسفه مشرق» در نومعتزلیان؛ گفتوگوی انتقادی با نصرحامد ابوزید، محمد ارکون، محمد عابدالجابری و حسن حنفی، مصاحبه کننده: محمدرضا وصفی، چاپ اول، تهران: نگاه معاصر.
10
عابدالجابری، محمد. (1389). نقدعقل عربی؛ تکوین عقل عربی؛ پژوهشی ساختارگرا در
11
شکلگیری عقلانیت کلاسیک عرب. ترجمۀ سید محمد آل مهدی، چاپ اول، تهران: نسل آفتاب.
12
عابدالجابری، محمد. (1391a). سقراطهایی از گونهدیگر؛ روشنفکران در تمدنعربی[براساس منابع و دیدگاه اهلتسنن]. ترجمۀ سید محمد آل مهدی، چاپ دوم، تهران: فرهنگ جاوید.
13
عابدالجابری، محمد. (1391b). خوانشی نوین از فلسفۀ مغرب و اندلس ترجمۀ سید محمد آل مهدی، چاپ اول، تهران: ثالث.
14
عابدالجابری، محمد. (1392). خوانشی نوین از زندگی و فلسفه اِبنرُشد. ترجمۀ سیدمحمد آل مهدی، چاپ اول، تهران: آوای سورنا.
15
عابدالجابری، محمد. (1393). رهیافتی به قرآن کریم؛ در تعریف قرآن. ترجمۀ محسن آرمین، چاپ اول، تهران: نی.
16
فارابی، ابونصر. (1389). السیاسه المدنیه. ترجمۀ حسن ملکشاهی، چاپ دوم، تهران: انتشارات صدا و سیمای جمهوری اسلامی ایران.
17
لوئیس، برنارد. (1390). « نظری تاریخی به اسلام و دموکراسی لیبرال» در فلسفه و جامعه و سیاست، نوشتۀ ماریو بارگاسیوسا و دیگران، گزیده و نوشتۀ و ترجمۀ عزتالله فولادوند، چاپ دوم، تهران: ماهی.
18
مطهری، مرتضی. (1390). خدمات متقابل اسلام و ایران. چاپ چهل و چهارم، تهران: انتشارات صدرا.
19
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Visibility-Power Relations in Foucault s Tought
Visibility, as a key factor in Foucault’s analyses, had a major role in his thought. It is represented in three ways in his studies: as visual descriptions, as a principle in formation of knowledge, and as a technology of power. Although Foucault’s emphasis on visual descriptions made some scholars considering him as a visual philosopher, by contrast, his revealing of visibility-power relation, induced others to describe him as an opponent of ocularcentrism and believe that Foucault uses “vision” for “denigration of vision”. Thus, this article, by clarifying Foucault’s approach to “vision” and “visibility”, tries to represent a subtle image of visibility-power relation in his thought. In this article, we will discuss that, although the importance of visibility and vision is perceptible in Foucault’s very first works, but it’s in his genealogies which the relation power-visibility and its role in human subjectivation are highlighted. Power, on the one hand, make visibilities and, on the other hand, these visibilities make power analysis, power exercise, and even intervening in power, possible, in turn. Power, in royal as well as modern societies made profit of visibilities; by displaying its glory, hiding itself, and surveillance. Foucault, emphasizing on visibilities of different eras and its relation to power, tries to show us all the ways of visibility are not possible in any given era, and there are limitations in what we can see.
https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_7509_232a17f7b18988c4c11bcba36012bfa2.pdf
2016-12-21
85
104
10.22054/wph.2017.7509
Foucault
Visibility
Power
Archeology
Genealogy
Samira
Royan
hurutat@yahoo.com
1
Ph.D. student of Comparative and Analytical History of Islamic Art University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
LEAD_AUTHOR
Samad
Samanian
samanian_s@yahoo.com
2
Associate Professor of art research at the University of Art, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Masoud
Olia
m.olya@yahoo.com
3
Assistant Professor of Art Philosophy at Art University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
AUTHOR
دریفوس، هیوبرت و پل رابینو. (1379). میشل فوکو: فراسوی ساختگرایی و هرمنوتیک. ترجمۀ حسین بشیریه، تهران: نشر نی.
1
فوکو، میشل. (1375). این یک چپق نیست: با نقاشی هایی از رنه مگریت. ترجمۀ مانی حقیقی، تهران: نشر مرکز.
2
فوکو، میشل. (1379).ایران: روح یک جهان بی روح (و 9 گفت و گوی دیگر با میشل فوکو). مترجمان: نیکو سرخوش و افشین جهاندیده، تهران: نشر نی.
3
Cook, James W. (September 2008) ,”Seeing the Visual in U. S. History”, The journal of American History, 95(2), 432-441.
4
De Certeau, Michel. (1986). Heterologies: Discourse on the other, trans. Brian Massumi, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5
Deleuze, Gilles. (1988). Foucault, English trans., London: continuum press.
6
Deleuze, Gilles. (2006). Two regimes of madness: texts and interviews 1975–1995, Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
7
Foucault, Michel. (1965). Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, Trans. Richard Howard,1988, New York: vintage.
8
Foucault, Michel. (1962). “Dire et Voir Chez Raymond Roussel”, Lettre Ouverte, No. 4, 38-51.
9
Foucault, Michel. (1963). Raymond Roussel, Paris: Editions Gallimard.
10
Foucault, Michel. (1970).The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith, 1994, New York: Vintage.
11
Foucault, Michel. (1972). Archeaology of Knowledge, trans. Alan Sheridan, 1989, New York: vintage.
12
Foucault, Michel. (1973). The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception, Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Vintage.
13
Foucault, Michel. (1979). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan, New York: vintage.
14
Foucault, Michel. (1980). “The Eye of Power”, inPower/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and other Writings1972-1977, trans.Colin Gordon et al. New York: Pantheon Books.
15
Foucault, Michel. (1978). The History of Sexuality, vol.1: an Introduction, trans. Robert Hurley, New York: Vintage.
16
Foucault, Michel. (1985). The History of sexuality, vol.2: The Use of Pleasure, trans. Robert Hurley, New York: vintage.
17
Foucault, Michel. (1984). “On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Progress”, in The Foucault Reader, ed. Paul Rabinow, 1991, London: Penguin books.
18
Foucault, Michel. (1988). Michele Foucault Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and other Writings 1977-1984, ed. Lawrence D. Kritzman, trans. M. A. Sheridan and others, New York: Rutledge.
19
Foucault, Michel. (1988b). “The Minimalist Self”, in Michele Foucault politics Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and other Writings 1977-1984, ed. Lawrence D. Kritzman, trans. M. A. Sheridan and others, New York: Rutledge.
20
Gordon, Neve. (2002). “On Visibility and Power: An Arendtian Corrective of Foucault”, Human Studies, 25, 114-25.
21
Jay, Martin. (1986)., “The Empire of Gaze”, in Foucault: A Critical Reader, David Couzens Hoy (ed.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 175-204.
22
Jay, Martin. (1993). Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of vision in Twentieth Century French Thought, California: University of California Press.
23
Miller, Jacques-Alain. (1975) “Jeremy Bentham’s Panoptic Device”, Ornicar, May 1975, pp. 3-36.
24
R. Flynn, Thomas. (1993). “Foucault and the Eclipse of Vision”, in Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision, ed. Michael Levin, California: University of California Press.
25
Rajchman, John. (1988). “Foucault’s Art of Seeing”, October, Vol. 44, pp88-117.
26
Shapiro, Gray. (2003), Archaeologies of Vision: Foucault and Nietzsche on Seeing and Saying, Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
27
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Analyzing of Wittgenstein Approach to Self-referential
There are at leastthree different approaches to self-referential in the tradition of analytic philosophy including Russellian approach, positivistian, approachand Wittgensteinian approach. Each of these approaches have suggested distinct solution for the self-referential problem. Among themthe Wittgensteinian one has caused much debate. The penultimate Phrase of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (6.54) says that all terms are meaningless, Including himself.This self-referential puts the audience of Tractatus in the paradoxical situation.This self-referential puts the audience of Tractatus in the paradoxical situation.Wittgenstein, by invent ion of the concept of ladder wants to escape from t he self-referential. Of the two interpretations, Resolute Reading and Ineffability Reading have addressed this topic. They try to give text bay consistent readivg of the interpreting the word "nonsense". But these two interpretations to each other through the criticism seems to be basically self-referential approach to resolve the crisis Wittgensteinian not help.But leveling criticism by these two interpretations to each other shows that basically self-referential approach is incapabel to resolve this crisis.
https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_7510_7ef99ca4c36ac78d2338665a489ebdce.pdf
2016-12-21
105
124
10.22054/wph.2017.7510
Self-referential
Early Wittgenstein
Ineffability reading
Resolute Reading
Morteza
Vaez ghassemi
morteza.vaez@gmail.com
1
Master of Philosophy of Logic, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
LEAD_AUTHOR
Ali Akbar
Ahmadi Aframjani
a.a.ahmadi.a@gmail.com
2
Associate professor of philosophy, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.
AUTHOR
احمدی افرمجانی، علیاکبر. (1390). رهیافت دوزبانۀ تارسکی. تهران: نشر علم.
1
سالرنو. جوزف. (1390). فلسفۀ فرگه. ترجمۀ علی بهروزی، تهران: نشر نی.
2
فوسنکول، ویلهم. (1385). گفتنیها و ناگفتنیها. ترجمۀ ملک حسینی. تهران: هرمس.
3
کاپلستون. فردریک. (1382). از بنتام تا راسل. ترجمۀ بهاالدین خرمشاهی. تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی و سروش.
4
گیلیس، دانالد. (1381). فلسفه علم در قرن بیستم. ترجمۀ احمد میانداری، قم: موسسه فرهنگی طه.
5
ویتگنشتاین، لودویگ. (1393). رسالۀ منطقی- فلسفی. ترجمۀ سروش دباغ. تهران: هرمس.
6
ویتگنشتاین، لودویگ. (1385). یادداشتها (1916-1914). ترجمۀ موسی دیباج و مریم حیات شاهی. تهران: انتشارات سعادت.
7
Bolander,Thomas. (2015). Self-Reference, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
8
Bronzo. Silver. (2012). The Resolute Reading and Its Critics: An Introduction to the Literature1[Forthcoming in Wittgenstein-Studien, Vol. 3, p 11.
9
Diamond, Cora. (1988). “Throwing Away the Ladder”, Philosophy, Vol. 63, No. 243, pp. 5-27.
10
Hacker, Peter. (1998). “Analytic Philosophy: What, Whence and Whither?” , in Anat Biletzki and Anat Matar, eds., The Story of Analytic Philosophy. Plot and Heroes, London and New York: Routledge, pp 3–34.
11
Irvine,Andrew David, Deutsch, Harry. (2014), Russell's Paradox, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
12
Maurer, Michael. (2013).Is the Resolute Reading Really Inconsistent? Trying to Get Clear on Hacker vs. Diamond/Conant , Papers of the 32rd IWS (the International Wittgenstein Symposia in Kirchberg) eds. E. Nemeth, R. Heinrich, W. Pichle, From: // http: // wittgensteinrepository. org/ agora -alws/ article/ view/ 2894/ 3512.
13
Moser, Paul K. (1997). “Epistemology”, edited by John V.Canfild Philosophy of Meaning, Knowledge and Value in the C20, London and New York: Routledge History of Philosophy, Volume X ,pp140-141.
14
Mounce, H.O. (2001). “CRITICAL NOTICE”, Ed. Alice Crary and Rupert Read, The New Wittgenstein, London and New York: Routledge, pp. v +403.
15
Passmor, John. (1972). Logical Positivism. in paul Edwards, ed. Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (New York: Macmillian Company and Free press, London: Collier Macmillian, , Vol. V, pp 256-257.
16
Schuster, Radek. (2010). Wittgenstein’s Picture Theory of Language and Self-Reference,Papers of the 33rd IWS (the International Wittgenstein Symposia in Kirchberg) eds. E. Nemeth, R. Heinrich, W. Pichle, From: // http://wittgensteinrepository.org/agora-alws/article/view/2894/3512.
17
Smith. Michael R. Jr.(2012 ). To Begin at the Beginning: Wittgenstein and the Problem of Metaphysics,Academic Research and Dissertations.Book 2, p19.
18
Wallgren, Thomas.(2001). Lofty Ladders, Rough Ground Learning from Hacker vs. Diamond, Papers of the 24th IWS (the International Wittgenstein Symposia in Kirchberg), From: http: // wab. uib. no/a gora/ tools/ alws/ collection -1 –issue -1 –article -26. annotate# index. xml- back. 1 _div. 1.
19