philosophy
Hanieh sadat zendehbad; Mohammad Mansour Falamaki; abdolkarim rashidian; shadi azizi
Abstract
Houses and Museums mutually serve as memory narrators. Unlike goods and objects and the modern identity "idolatry", both are susceptible to opening up a dynamic world. This dynamism is on the verge and they are positioned in the context of flowing experiences in time and space. Comparatively, visitors ...
Read More
Houses and Museums mutually serve as memory narrators. Unlike goods and objects and the modern identity "idolatry", both are susceptible to opening up a dynamic world. This dynamism is on the verge and they are positioned in the context of flowing experiences in time and space. Comparatively, visitors to a museum extend the energy that is mixed with the museum's interior space and take it with them when they leave. The pleasures of museums are transient: Threshold. But we reside in our house. Except when we are guests and must move. When it comes to significant human subjects, this challenge is frequently combined with a component of memory that, in many cases, involves the absence or lack of a stimulating factor. As a result, whenever these memories are retrieved, they are recreated in a different manner. This revision in translational constructs is the completion of a number of unfinished ones that occur to us as a result of our varied and conflicting encounters with language and culture. This welcoming verge to the target language is an invitation from unknown factors of the source language. A long-standing interaction has existed between homes and museums. The study of translation theory can therefore aid in gaining an understanding of the foundations of critical theories held by the architectural community with philosophical expertise. This study aims to apply Derrida's strategy of deconstruction to analyze an original and translated text in the language, considering that every piece of architecture may serve as a written text.
