Mohammad Jaberynasr; parvaneh Valavi; Masoud Safaei Moghadam; Alireza Haji Yakhchali
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to study creativity as an original understanding based on Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics, and its implications for education. The research method was analytical-deductive. Creativity is one of the highest goals of all educational systems. Different approaches to ...
Read More
The purpose of this research was to study creativity as an original understanding based on Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics, and its implications for education. The research method was analytical-deductive. Creativity is one of the highest goals of all educational systems. Different approaches to Psychology, consistent with the general theoretical frameworks and large assumptions that have been accepted, have provided different and sometimes contradictory definitions. However, creativity is certainly a kind of understanding, a genuine understanding that transcends existing Knowledge. The fundamental axis of Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics is what is understood. In this research, while analyzing Gadamer's view on understanding, he examines creativity as the most original type of understanding from Gadamer's point of view and as an example of his practical wisdom, and principles such as not being able to be trained, the ability to be specific, and measure additionality to creativity from the point of view of Godammer's philosophical hermeneutics as well as educational implications such as education goal, form of educational system, teaching method, curriculum, learning, evaluation, motivation and research method were extracted.
mohammad rezai
Abstract
Mulla Sadra devotes considerable attention to the soul as the subject and considers it to be a creative being. As realization of perceptions is one of the fundamental subjects of epistemology, this article claims that reliance on the creativity of soul during the process of perception does not guarantee ...
Read More
Mulla Sadra devotes considerable attention to the soul as the subject and considers it to be a creative being. As realization of perceptions is one of the fundamental subjects of epistemology, this article claims that reliance on the creativity of soul during the process of perception does not guarantee the eidetic objectivity of perceptions with material beings as a part of perception; however, the forms created by the soul, i.e. subjects known indirectly become objects known by presence thanks to the creativity of soul. Whatever their relation with the subjects known indirectly, they could not b claimed to have eidetic objectivity. Moreover, the unity between soul and active intellect could not prove that the mental forms should necessarily have eidetic objectivity with material beings.
