Payam Aghasi; Azizolah Afshar Kermani
Abstract
The different definitions of rationalists and empiricists from man have different approaches to man. Hegel offers a dialectical view of whole and part together in a Kantian-Spinoza context by defining man as an embodiment subject, while also paying attention to his totality, while also showing the importance ...
Read More
The different definitions of rationalists and empiricists from man have different approaches to man. Hegel offers a dialectical view of whole and part together in a Kantian-Spinoza context by defining man as an embodiment subject, while also paying attention to his totality, while also showing the importance of his particularity and individuality. Mulla Sadra, on the other hand, makes a significant contribution to the body in perception. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of the embodiment of the subject on the principle of conatus from the perspective of Mulla Sadra and Hegel. Just as the embodiment of the subject in Hegel's view leads to the conatus, the acceptance of the axis of the soul-body as the subject for Mulla Sadra also leads to the conatus, albeit with differences, which in turn, in addition to individual and social changes in the attitudes to the humanities and the importance of physical life and collective well-being, lead to a change in the attitude towards humanities.
